首页> 外文期刊>Information economics and policy >Net neutrality and CDN intermediation
【24h】

Net neutrality and CDN intermediation

机译:净中性和CDN中介

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We analyze competition between Internet Service Providers (ISPs) where consumers demand heterogeneous content within two Quality-of-Service (QoS) regimes, Net Neutrality and Paid Prioritization, and show that paid prioritization increases the static efficiency compared to a neutral network. We also consider paid prioritization intermediated by Content Delivery Networks (CDNs). While the use of CDNs is welfare neutral, it results in higher consumer prices for internet access. Regarding incentives to invest in network capacity we show that prioritization regimes lead to higher incentives than the neutral regime as long as capacity is scarce, while investment is highest in the presence of CDNs. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:我们分析了互联网服务提供商(ISP)之间的竞争,在这些竞争中,消费者需要两种服务质量(QoS)机制(网络中立性和付费优先级)内的异构内容,并显示付费优先级与中立网络相比提高了静态效率。我们还考虑了内容交付网络(CDN)中介的付费优先级。尽管CDN的使用不影响福利,但它会导致更高的消费者上网价格。关于对网络容量进行投资的激励措施,我们表明,只要容量不足,优先排序制度就会比中立制度带来更高的激励作用,而CDN存在时投资最高。 (C)2019 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号