首页> 外文期刊>Information Communication & Society >Where 'fake news' flourishes: a comparison across four Western democracies
【24h】

Where 'fake news' flourishes: a comparison across four Western democracies

机译:“假新闻”蓬勃发展:四个西方民主国家的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

How does the content of so-called ?fake news? differ across Western democracies? While previous research on online disinformation has focused on the individual level, the current study aims to shed light on cross-national differences. It compares online disinformation re-published by fact checkers from four Western democracies (the US, the UK, Germany, and Austria). The findings reveal significant differences between English-speaking and German-speaking countries. In the US and the UK, the largest shares of partisan disinformation are found, while in Germany and Austria sensationalist stories prevail. Moreover, in English-speaking countries, disinformation frequently attacks political actors, whereas in German-speaking countries, immigrants are most frequently targeted. Across all of the countries, topics of false stories strongly mirror national news agendas. Based on these results, the paper argues that online disinformation is not only a technology-driven phenomenon but also shaped by national information environments.
机译:所谓的内容如何?假新闻?西方民主国家的不同之处?虽然以前关于在线虚假的研究专注于个人层面,但目前的研究旨在阐明跨国差异。它比较了由四个西方民主国家(美国,英国,德国和奥地利的事实跳棋重新发布的在线虚假信息。调查结果揭示了英语和德语国家之间的显着差异。在美国和英国,发现了党派不奉献的最大份额,而在德国和奥地利轰动师故事中占上风。此外,在讲英语国家,不宣传频繁攻击政治行动者,而在德语国家,移民最常被瞄准。遍布所有国家,虚假故事的主题强烈镜像国家新闻议程。根据这些结果,本文认为,在线消号不仅是技术驱动的现象,而且由国家信息环境塑造。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号