首页> 外文期刊>Industrial marketing management >A comparison of manufacturers and financial services suppliers' and buyers' use of relationship management methods
【24h】

A comparison of manufacturers and financial services suppliers' and buyers' use of relationship management methods

机译:制造商与金融服务供应商和买方使用关系管理方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Suppliers and customers work within a network in which they have a vast array of diverse relationships they have to manage [Easton, G. (1992). Industrial networks: A new view of reality. London: Routledge; Turnbull, P. W., & Moustakatos, T. Int. J. Bank Mark. 14 (1996) 26]. Past research in relationship portfolio analysis [Turnbull, P. W., & Cunningham, M. T. (Eds.). (1981). International marketing and purchasing: A survey among marketing and purchasing executives in five European countries. London: Macmillan Press; Fioca, R. Ind. Mark. Manage. 11 (1982) 53; Campbell, N. C. G. & Cunningham, M. T. Strateg. Manage. J. 4 (1983) 369; Reicheld, F. F. & Sasser W. E. Harv. Bus. Rev. (1990) 105; Krapfel, R. E., Salmond, D., & Spekman R. Eur. J. Mark. 25 (1991) 72] has sought to enable companies to allocate resources efficiently and effectively to different kinds of relationships. However, little research has been carried out to investigate how this concept can be applied across sectors, across functions, across manufacturing and financial services, and across suppliers and buyers. This research explores three methods of managing relationships: formal, documented systems, personal judgement, and meetings. The perceived usefulness of each method and combination of methods used varied across industrial sectors and functions. All three methods were used by the majority of financial suppliers and buyers and manufacturing buyers while manufacturing suppliers tended to use personal judgement and meetings. Overall, meetings were perceived as the most useful method for managing relationships. Formal, documented systems were generally perceived as the least useful method by all of the groups except the financial services buyers. Since relationship portfolio analysis is generally perceived as being less useful than personal judgement and meetings, researchers must reexamine the models put forward to improve their applicability and usefulness in industrial settings.
机译:供应商和客户在一个网络中工作,在该网络中,他们必须管理多种多样的关系[Easton,G.(1992)。工业网络:现实的新视角。伦敦:Routledge;特恩布尔(W.)和穆斯塔卡托斯(M. J.银行马克。 14(1996)26]。关系投资组合分析的过去研究[Turnbull,P. W.,&Cunningham,M. T.(编辑)。 (1981)。国际市场营销和采购:对五个欧洲国家的市场营销和采购主管进行的调查。伦敦:麦克米伦出版社; Fioca,R。Ind。Mark。管理。 11(1982)53;坎贝尔(N. C. G. G.)和坎宁安(Cunningham),M。T. Strateg。管理。 J.4(1983)369; Reicheld,F。F.和Sasser W. E. Harv。总线。修订(1990)105; Krapfel,R. E.,Salmond,D.,&Spekman R. Eur。 J.马克25(1991)72]寻求使公司能够有效地将资源分配给不同类型的关系。但是,很少进行研究来研究如何将此概念跨部门,跨职能,跨制造和金融服务以及跨供应商和买方应用。这项研究探索了三种管理关系的方法:正式的,成文的系统,个人判断和会议。每种方法的感知效用以及所用方法的组合在整个行业和功能上都各不相同。大多数金融供应商,买家和制造业买家都使用这三种方法,而制造业供应商则倾向于使用个人判断和会议。总体而言,会议被认为是管理关系的最有用方法。正式的,有文件记录的系统通常被认为是除金融服务购买者之外所有团体中最没有用的方法。由于通常认为关系投资组合分析不如个人判断和会议有用,因此研究人员必须重新审查为提高其在工业环境中的适用性和实用性而提出的模型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号