...
首页> 外文期刊>Industrial Law Journal >The Public Sector Equality Duty
【24h】

The Public Sector Equality Duty

机译:公共部门平等义务

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

A key advance of the Equality Act 2010 is its introduction of a single equality duty. The new ‘public sector equality duty’ harmonises the earlier duties and extends its coverage to include other protected characteristics. In addition, the statutory aims have been deepened to reflect a substantive conception of equality. However, the core of the duty is unchanged. It is a duty to ‘have due regard’, not to take steps or to achieve equality. Is this an attempt to incorporate a deliberative, reflexive approach to achieving equality, recognising that a straightforward command and control approach might encounter unproductive resistance? Or does it reflect a fundamental ambivalence as to the importance of equality issues? Section 2 below examines the structure of the statutory provisions. Section 3 asks whether the statutory provision is an example of reflexive law. Particular attention is paid to the spate of judicial review cases relying on the equality duty to challenge a range of budget cuts. It is argued that courts have struggled to deal with the regulatory challenges presented by the equality duties. Nor is it clear that a reflexive approach is appropriate to achieve substantive equality.
机译:2010年《平等法》的一项主要进步是它引入了单一平等义务。新的“公共部门平等义务”与以前的职责保持一致,并将其范围扩大到包括其他受保护的特征。此外,法定目标已经加深,以反映实质性的平等概念。但是,职责的核心是不变的。 “有适当的尊重”是我们的责任,而不是采取步骤或实现平等。是否认识到直接的命令和控制方法可能会遇到非生产性的阻力,是否试图将协商,反思性方法纳入实现平等的尝试?还是在平等问题的重要性上体现了根本的矛盾?下文第2节研究了法定条款的结构。第3节询问,该法律规定是否是反身法的一个例子。特别要注意大量依靠平等义务来挑战一系列预算削减的司法审查案件。有人认为,法院一直在努力应对平等义务带来的监管挑战。也不清楚采用反身方法来实现实质性平等。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号