...
首页> 外文期刊>Indoor Air >Evaluating the commercial airliner cabin environment with different air distribution systems
【24h】

Evaluating the commercial airliner cabin environment with different air distribution systems

机译:用不同的空气分配系统评估商业客机舱内环境

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Ventilation systems for commercial airliner cabins are important in reducing contaminant transport and maintaining thermal comfort. To evaluate the performance of a personalized displacement ventilation system, a conventional displacement ventilation system, and a mixing ventilation system, this study first used the Wells-Riley equation integrated with CFD to obtain the SARS quanta value based on a specific SARS outbreak on a flight. This investigation then compared the three ventilation systems in a seven-row section of a fully occupied, economy-class cabin in Boeing 737 and Boeing 767 airplanes. The SARS quanta generation rate obtained for the index patient could be used in future studies. For all the assumed source locations, the passengers' infection risk by air in the two planes was the highest with the mixing ventilation system, while the conventional displacement ventilation system produced the lowest risk. The personalized ventilation system performed the best in maintaining cabin thermal comfort and can also reduce the infection risk. This system is recommended for airplane cabins.
机译:商用客机舱室的通风系统对于减少污染物运输并保持热舒适性很重要。为了评估个性化位移通风系统的性能,传统的位移通风系统和混合通风系统,本研究首先使用了与CFD集成的井里方程基于飞行中的特定SARS爆发获得SARS Quanta值。然后,该调查将三个通风系统与波音737和波音767飞机的全占用,经济舱舱的七排通风系统进行了比较。为指数患者获得的SARS量子产生率可用于未来的研究。对于所有假设的源位置,两架飞机中空气的乘客感染风险最高,搅拌通风系统最高,而传统的位移通风系统产生了最低的风险。个性化通风系统在维持舱室热舒适性方面表现最佳,也可以降低感染风险。这款系统建议用于飞机舱。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号