首页> 外文期刊>Indoor Air >Evaluating the commercial airliner cabin environment with different air distribution systems
【24h】

Evaluating the commercial airliner cabin environment with different air distribution systems

机译:使用不同的空气分配系统评估民航客舱环境

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Ventilation systems for commercial airliner cabins are important in reducing contaminant transport and maintaining thermal comfort. To evaluate the performance of a personalized displacement ventilation system, a conventional displacement ventilation system, and a mixing ventilation system, this study first used the Wells-Riley equation integrated with CFD to obtain the SARS quanta value based on a specific SARS outbreak on a flight. This investigation then compared the three ventilation systems in a seven-row section of a fully occupied, economy-class cabin in Boeing 737 and Boeing 767 airplanes. The SARS quanta generation rate obtained for the index patient could be used in future studies. For all the assumed source locations, the passengers' infection risk by air in the two planes was the highest with the mixing ventilation system, while the conventional displacement ventilation system produced the lowest risk. The personalized ventilation system performed the best in maintaining cabin thermal comfort and can also reduce the infection risk. This system is recommended for airplane cabins.
机译:商业飞机机舱的通风系统对于减少污染物的运输和保持热舒适性很重要。为了评估个性化排量通风系统,常规排量通风系统和混合通风系统的性能,本研究首先使用结合了CFD的Wells-Riley方程来基于特定的SARS暴发来获得SARS量子值。 。然后,这项调查在波音737和波音767飞机的全座经济舱机舱的七排区域中比较了三个通风系统。为该索引患者获得的SARS量子发生率可用于将来的研究。对于所有假定的排放源位置,在混合通风系统中,两架飞机中乘客的空气感染风险最高,而常规置换通风系统产生的风险最低。个性化的通风系统在保持机舱热舒适性方面发挥了最佳作用,还可以降低感染风险。建议将此系统用于飞机机舱。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号