首页> 外文期刊>Inbound logistics >Rail Price Controls? Ridicule the Thought
【24h】

Rail Price Controls? Ridicule the Thought

机译:铁路价格控制?嘲笑这个想法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

That is what happens in competitive markets: Competition drives down prices, while service usually increases. However, things that happened 40 years ago are hard to remember today. When it comes to public policy, that is a problem. Almost nobody who currently works in rail policy has the institutional knowledge of what the rail industry was like before it was freed from government constraints. Now that things are good and shipping is cheap, bureaucrats are considering what should be unthinkable: restoring price controls. In 1887, Congress passed the Interstate Commerce Act. The intent was to break the railroads' monopoly power. This never works, but Congress loves trying. Fast forward 100 years, and regulations and price controls almost bankrupted the rail industry. So, in 1980, Congress passed the Staggers Rail Act, which allowed for deregulation and for shippers to compete. Freight rates fell by 45%.
机译:这就是竞争市场发生的事情:竞争推动价格,而服务通常会增加。然而,40年前发生的事情很难记住今天。谈到公共政策,这是一个问题。目前在铁路政策中的工作几乎没有人具有在释放政府限制之前的铁路行业就是这样的制度知识。现在事情是良好的并且运输很便宜,官僚正在考虑什么应该是不可想象的:恢复价格控制。 1887年,国会通过了州际商务法案。意图是打破铁路的垄断力量。这永远不会有效,但国会喜欢尝试。快速前进100年,法规和价格控制几乎破产了铁路行业。因此,在1980年,国会通过了滞录人铁路行为,这允许放松管制和托运人竞争。运费下降了45%。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Inbound logistics》 |2021年第1期|82-82|共1页
  • 作者

    Charles Sauer;

  • 作者单位

    The Market Institute;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号