首页> 外文期刊>IIC:International review of intellectual property and competition law >Goods in Transit and Trade Mark Law (and Intellectual Property Law?)
【24h】

Goods in Transit and Trade Mark Law (and Intellectual Property Law?)

机译:过境商品和商标法(以及知识产权法?)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The new trade mark law texts of the European Union aim, inter alia , at overruling the doctrine proposed by the EU Court of Justice in a long series of decisions – most notably Montex and Philips and Nokia – in relation to trade mark law and goods in transit. The wording of the new texts seems to impose on the trade mark holder requesting the blocking of goods in transit, only the burden of proof of the existence of his trade mark right and of its infringement in the country of transit. The author suggests the possibility of an alternative interpretation, according to which the trade mark holder, in order to obtain the blocking of goods, must also give at least a prima facie evidence of the infringement of his right in the country of final destination. The reasons for this interpretation are identified in the principle of freedom of transit imposed by the GATT, in the general rules on the burden of proof, and in the principle of the proximity of the evidence. In conclusion, the author signals that the new rules are not technically justified by specific lines of trade mark law, hence they could be extended easily – by the legislator or by case law – to all other intellectual property rights.
机译:欧洲联盟的新商标法文本旨在,尤其是推翻欧盟法院在涉及商标法和商品的一系列长期决定中,尤其是蒙特克斯,飞利浦和诺基亚,提出的原则。过境。新案文的措词似乎强加给商标持有人,要求封锁在途货物,只是证明他的商标权存在和在过境国侵权的举证责任。作者提出了另一种解释的可能性,根据这种解释,商标持有人为了获得商品封锁,还必须至少提供表面证据,证明其在最终目的地国的权利受到侵犯。关贸总协定强加的过境自由原则,举证责任的一般规则和证据接近原则均确定了作出这种解释的原因。总而言之,作者表示,新规则在技术上没有特定的商标法依据,因此可以很容易地(通过立法者或判例法)将其扩展到所有其他知识产权。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号