...
首页> 外文期刊>International review of intellectual property and competition law >Reforming the C-DSM Reform: A User-Based Copyright Theory for Commonplace Creativity
【24h】

Reforming the C-DSM Reform: A User-Based Copyright Theory for Commonplace Creativity

机译:改革C-DSM改革:一种基于用户的版权理论,用于普通创意

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

A few years ago, Neelie Kroes warned that because of ill-adapted laws to technological development, "every day citizens […] across the EU break the law just to do something commonplace". According to Kroes, the Single Market "cried out" for copyright reform. Finally, the EU responded to that call for reform but, unfortunately, with the wrong answer. As part of its recent reform to adapt copyright to the Digital Single Market (DSM), the EU Parliament has approved Art. 17 of the Copyright in the DSM Directive, which might dismantle the traditional knowledge and take-down system, while imposing enhanced liability on user-generated content (UGC) platforms, which might incentivize proactive censorship and cripple competition. Article 17 tells the story of a dream of change where ill-adapted laws that citizens break "just to do something commonplace" no longer exist that instead awakes to a reality of unfulfilled expectations. Instead of being guided by a welfare or cultural approach where citizens' interests and fundamental rights take centre stage, outdated fairness and personality approaches dominate the policy discourse, emphasizing rightholders' interests and seeking cooperation with online service providers to the detriment of users. Instead of changing the law so that it is legal and easier for users "to do something commonplace", legislators have engineered the law so that online gatekeepers have an incentive to prevent, block, filter and sanitize proactively that commonplace digital creativity. In contrast, copyright reform in the digital environment should build upon the DSM Directive licensing emphasis by launching a coordinated approach that should focus on creators' compensation, rather than exclusive rights, and include (1) exceptions and limitations that might serve as a basis for (2) fair compensation (3) through statutory/compulsory, collective and extended licensing mechanisms (4) collected through a levy system (5) that might leverage income from online-platform advertising.
机译:几年前,Neelie Kroes警告说,由于适应了技术发展的法律,“每天都是欧盟的公民违反了法律只是为了做某事”。根据克罗斯的说法,单一市场“哭泣”版权改革。最后,欧盟回应了改革的呼吁,但不幸的是,错误的答案。作为适应数字单一市场(DSM)版权的最近改革的一部分,欧盟议会已批准艺术。 17 DSM指令的版权可能拆除传统知识和减少系统,同时对用户生成的内容(UGC)平台施加了增强的责任,这可能会激励主动审查和跛脚竞争。第十七条讲述了一个变革梦想的故事,不适用于公民突破“只是为了做某事”不再存在,而是唤醒一个不达到的预期的现实。而不是被公民利益和基本权利的福利或文化方法所指导,而过时的公平和个性方法主导政策话语,强调扶手的利益,并寻求与在线服务提供商的合作,以损害用户。而不是改变法律,以便用户“做一些常见的事情”是合法的,更容易“,立法者已经设计了法律,以便在线守门人有激励,拦截,积极地防止,弥合,过滤和消毒普遍性的数字创造力。相比之下,数字环境中的版权改革应通过推出应专注于创作者的赔偿,而不是专属权利,并包括(1)可能作为基础的例外和限制的协调方法来构建DSM指令许可(2)公平赔偿(3)通过法定/强制,集体和扩展许可机制(4)通过征收系统(5)收集,可能会利用来自在线平台广告的收入。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号