...
首页> 外文期刊>Semiconductor Manufacturing, IEEE Transactions on >A Comparative Study of Metamodels for Fast and Accurate Simulation of Nano-CMOS Circuits
【24h】

A Comparative Study of Metamodels for Fast and Accurate Simulation of Nano-CMOS Circuits

机译:快速精确模拟纳米CMOS电路元模型的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Fast simulation is a bottleneck for design space exploration of complex nanoscale CMOS (nano-CMOS) analog and mixed-signal (AMS) circuits. This paper presents the use of “metamodels” for fast and accurate AMS circuit design exploration. A design process flow that uses metamodels is introduced. Metamodel generation is the most time-consuming step of the design flow. Consequently, accurate and fast sampling of the design space is essential for the creation of the metamodel. Different sampling techniques are investigated to minimize the number of samples required. This paper uses two nanoscale CMOS analog circuits: a 45-nm ring oscillator and a 180-nm LC-VCO, as case studies. It is observed that the parasitics generated from the physical design of the circuits have a drastic effect on their performance metrics, such as frequency. Four alternative sampling techniques, both random [Monte Carlo (MC)] and uniform [Latin hypercube sampling (LHS), middle Latin hypercube sampling (MLHS), and design of experiments (DOEs)], are considered and compared for speed and accuracy. This paper provides a thorough exploration of these sampling techniques to determine which one is more suitable to minimize sampling size for metamodel generation and optimize the design cycle. Experiments show that LHS sampling is best for both circuits, followed by MLHS, MC, and DOE. In this paper, it is also shown that polynomial metamodels of order higher than two (which are commonly used) provide best accuracy.
机译:快速仿真是探索复杂纳米级CMOS(nano-CMOS)模拟和混合信号(AMS)电路的设计空间的瓶颈。本文介绍了使用“元模型”进行快速,准确的AMS电路设计探索。介绍了使用元模型的设计流程。元模型生成是设计流程中最耗时的步骤。因此,对设计空间进行准确,快速的采样对于创建元模型至关重要。研究了不同的采样技术以最大程度地减少所需的样本数量。作为案例研究,本文使用两个纳米级CMOS模拟电路:一个45 nm环形振荡器和一个180 nm LC-VCO。可以看出,电路物理设计产生的寄生效应对其性能指标(如频率)产生了巨大影响。考虑了四种替代采样技术,包括随机[Monte Carlo(MC)]和统一[拉丁超立方体采样(LHS),中拉丁超立方体采样(MLHS)和实验设计(DOE)],并比较了速度和准确性。本文对这些采样技术进行了全面的探索,以确定哪种方法更适合最小化用于元模型生成的采样大小并优化设计周期。实验表明,LHS采样对于这两个电路都是最佳的,其次是MLHS,MC和DOE。在本文中,还表明,阶数大于2(通常使用)的多项式元模型可提供最佳精度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号