...
首页> 外文期刊>IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing >Models of Clustered Photolithography Tools for Fab-Level Simulation: From Affine to Flow Line
【24h】

Models of Clustered Photolithography Tools for Fab-Level Simulation: From Affine to Flow Line

机译:用于晶圆级仿真的群集光刻工具模型:从仿射到流水线

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Fab-level discrete-event simulation is an important practical tool for the analysis and optimization of semiconductor wafer fabricators. In such facilities, a clustered photolithography tool (CPT) is by far the most expensive tool and often the capacity bottleneck. In this paper, we consider linear, affine, flow line, and detailed models of CPTs for use in fab-level simulation. We develop extensions to affine and flow line models and demonstrate exactly how to convert raw CPT data into the various models. Using a detailed CPT model based on industry data as the baseline, numerical experiments are conducted to test the models' fidelity for cycle time, lot residency time, and throughput. We also compare the computational burden of each model class. Further simulations are conducted to test the models' robustness to changing fab conditions, e.g., when lot size or train size changes. Flow line models are shown to be more accurate and robust than linear or affine models and require approximately 200 times less computation than detailed models.
机译:晶圆厂级离散事件模拟是分析和优化半导体晶圆制造商的重要实用工具。在这样的设施中,群集光刻工具(CPT)是迄今为止最昂贵的工具,并且通常是容量瓶颈。在本文中,我们考虑了线性,仿射,流线以及用于工厂级仿真的CPT的详细模型。我们开发了仿射和流线模型的扩展,并确切演示了如何将原始CPT数据转换为各种模型。使用基于行业数据的详细CPT模型作为基准,进行了数值实验,以测试模型在循环时间,批次停留时间和吞吐量方面的逼真度。我们还比较了每个模型类的计算负担。进行了进一步的仿真以测试模型在变化的晶圆厂条件下的稳健性,例如,当批量大小或列车尺寸发生变化时。显示出流线模型比线性或仿射模型更准确,更可靠,并且所需计算量比详细模型少约200倍。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号