首页> 外文期刊>IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication >Demand modeling, new mode problems, and the $64 (sic) question: technological utopianism in America's race to develop high speed rail technology
【24h】

Demand modeling, new mode problems, and the $64 (sic) question: technological utopianism in America's race to develop high speed rail technology

机译:需求建模,新模式问题和64美元(原文如此)的问题:美国发展高铁技术的竞赛中的技术乌托邦主义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The author analyzes two reports describing a now abandoned MagLev (magnetic levitation) rail system that would have run from Ontario, California, to Las Vegas, Nevada. Unlike traditional technical reports, the Budd Company Transit Division's MagLev reports appeal to utopian visions of futuristic technologies that would solve America's social and economic problems of the 1980s. The writers of these reports employ economic and political rhetoric such as risk modeling, market projections, appeals to the American dream and new frontier mentality, as well as xenophobic Japan-bashing, and downplay technical constraints on rail corridors. An analysis of these reports reveals the ethical and rhetorical dilemmas that writers face when the companies they work for seek funding for untried and untested visionary designs.
机译:作者分析了两个报告,这些报告描述了现已废弃的MagLev(磁悬浮)铁路系统,该系统将从加利福尼亚的安大略省一直延伸到内华达州的拉斯维加斯。与传统的技术报告不同,Budd Company Transit部门的MagLev报告呼吁采用乌托邦式的未来技术,以解决1980年代美国的社会和经济问题。这些报告的撰写者采用了经济和政治言论,例如风险建模,市场预测,对美国梦的诉求和新的边境思想,以及仇外日本的抨击,以及轻描淡写的铁路走廊技术限制。对这些报告的分析揭示了当作家所在的公司为未经尝试和未经测试的有远见的设计寻求资金时,作家面临的道德和修辞困境。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号