首页> 外文期刊>IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication >Big science or bricolage: an alternative model for research in technical communication
【24h】

Big science or bricolage: an alternative model for research in technical communication

机译:大科学还是大难题:技术交流研究的替代模型

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Two research traditions inform contemporary technical communication research. With its physical science orientation and organizational capaciousness, the tradition of Big Science originated in the laboratory of Ernest O. Lawrence. With its humanistic orientation and individualistic singularity, the tradition of bricolage was identified in the fieldwork of Claude Le/spl acute/vi-Strauss. The current celebration of the former in technical communication research serves to reify a power-driven impulse for utility. The two cultures that result from such an impulse-the organizational professional and the academic researcher-have little common ground for research. To interrupt such harmful dynamics, an orientation to research is offered that celebrates successful past work in technological innovation, information design, the communication process, and the ways those processes emerge in specific contexts. To foster the continuation of such research, a community-based model is offered that draws its strength from the tradition of the bricoleur.
机译:两种研究传统为当代技术交流研究提供了信息。凭借其物理科学方向和组织能力,Big Science的传统起源于Ernest O. Lawrence的实验室。凭借其人文主义的取向和个人主义的奇异性,在克劳德·勒·斯普利特(Claude Le / spl)急性/ vi-史特劳斯(s-trauss)的野外工作中确定了Bricolage的传统。当前在技术交流研究中的前者庆祝活动旨在证明动力驱动的实用动力。这种冲动产生的两种文化-组织专业人士和学术研究人员-几乎没有共同的研究基础。为了打断这种有害的动力,我们提供了研究方向,以表彰过去在技术创新,信息设计,通信过程以及这些过程在特定情况下出现的方式方面的成功工作。为了促进此类研究的继续,提供了一种基于社区的模型,该模型从贿赂者的传统中汲取了力量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号