...
首页> 外文期刊>IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science >A Comparison of TMR With Alternative Fault-Tolerant Design Techniques for FPGAs
【24h】

A Comparison of TMR With Alternative Fault-Tolerant Design Techniques for FPGAs

机译:TMR与FPGA的替代容错设计技术的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

With growing interest in the use of SRAM-based FPGAs in space and other radiation environments, there is a greater need for efficient and effective fault-tolerant design techniques specific to FPGAs. Triple-modular redundancy (TMR) is a common fault mitigation technique for FPGAs and has been successfully demonstrated by several organizations. This technique, however, requires significant hardware resources. This paper evaluates three additional mitigation techniques and compares them to TMR. These include quadded logic, state machine encoding, and temporal redundancy, all well-known techniques in custom circuit technologies. Each of these techniques are compared to TMR in both area cost and fault tolerance. The results from this paper suggest that none of these techniques provides greater reliability and often require more resources than TMR.
机译:随着人们对在空间和其他辐射环境中使用基于SRAM的FPGA的兴趣日益浓厚,对FPGA特有的高效且有效的容错设计技术的需求日益增长。三重模块冗余(TMR)是FPGA常见的故障缓解技术,已被多个组织成功证明。但是,此技术需要大量的硬件资源。本文评估了另外三种缓解技术,并将它们与TMR进行了比较。这些包括四分之一逻辑,状态机编码和时间冗余,这是定制电路技术中所有众所周知的技术。这些技术中的每一种在面积成本和容错能力上都与TMR进行了比较。本文的结果表明,这些技术都无法提供比TMR更高的可靠性,并且通常需要更多的资源。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号