...
首页> 外文期刊>Nuclear Science, IEEE Transactions on >Single-Event Charge Collection and Upset in 40-nm Dual- and Triple-Well Bulk CMOS SRAMs
【24h】

Single-Event Charge Collection and Upset in 40-nm Dual- and Triple-Well Bulk CMOS SRAMs

机译:单事件电荷收集和40nm双阱和三阱批量CMOS SRAM的失电

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

CMOS technologies can be either dual-well or triple-well. Triple-well technology has several advantages compared to dual-well technology in terms of electrical performance. Differences in the ion-induced single-event response between these two technology options, however, are not well understood. This paper presents a comparative analysis of heavy ion-induced upsets in dual-well and triple-well 40-nm CMOS SRAMs. Primary factors affecting the charge-collection mechanisms for a wide range of particle energies are investigated, showing that triple-well technologies are more vulnerable to low-LET particles, while dual-well technologies are more vulnerable to high-LET particles. For the triple-well technology, charge confinement and multiple-transistor charge collection triggers the “Single Event Upset Reversal” mechanism that reduces sensitivity at higher LETs.
机译:CMOS技术可以是双阱或三阱。就电性能而言,与双井技术相比,三井技术具有多个优势。但是,这两种技术选择之间离子诱导的单事件响应的差异尚不十分清楚。本文提供了对双离子阱和三阱40nm CMOS SRAM中重离子引起的不安的比较分析。研究了影响大范围粒子能量电荷收集机制的主要因素,表明三阱技术更容易受到低LET粒子的影响,而双阱技术更容易受到高LET粒子的影响。对于三阱技术,电荷限制和多晶体管电荷收集触发了“单事件翻转逆转”机制,该机制降低了较高LET时的灵敏度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号