首页> 外文期刊>Network, IEEE >Carrier-grade ethernet:etherpath protection vs. ethertunnel protection
【24h】

Carrier-grade ethernet:etherpath protection vs. ethertunnel protection

机译:电信级以太网:以太网路径保护与以太网隧道保护

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Ethernet is a success story in local area networks. Efforts to extend its boundaries beyond LAN to the carriers' backbone networks are in progress. We study the problem of designing reliable and cost-efficient high-rate (100 Gb/s) carrier-grade Ethernet. Reliability is considered for application at one of two levels: Etherpath protection (where an Etherpath is a lightpath established by Ethernet interfaces) or Ethertunnel protection (where an Ethertunnel is an Ethernet connection). We develop the protection algorithms for the two cases, and study the trade-offs in their impact on network cost and implementation complexity. We consider practical settings for the envisioned next-generation carrier-grade Ethernet networks with the following characteristics: high-rate (up to 100 Gb/s) Etherpaths constrained by the signal's maximum all-optical transmission range before which 3R signal regeneration is required, and an Ethernet network with mixed line rates. Our algorithms, tested on a 17-node German study network, lead to the following findings: ETP is more resource-efficient than EPP, but EPP incurs less implementation complexity than ETP.
机译:以太网是局域网中的成功案例。正在努力将其范围从LAN扩展到运营商的骨干网。我们研究设计可靠且经济高效的高速(100 Gb / s)电信级以太网的问题。可靠性在以下两个级别之一中考虑应用:以太网路径保护(以太网路径是由以太网接口建立的光路径)或以太网隧道保护(以太网路径是以太网连接)。我们针对这两种情况开发了保护算法,并研究了它们对网络成本和实现复杂性的影响之间的权衡。我们考虑具有以下特征的下一代电信级以太网的实际设置:高速率(高达100 Gb / s)受到信号最大全光传输范围限制的以太网路径,在此之前需要进行3R信号再生,以及具有混合线速的以太网。我们的算法在一个由17个节点组成的德国研究网络上进行了测试,得出以下发现:ETP比EPP具有更高的资源效率,但是EPP的实现复杂性低于ETP。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号