...
首页> 外文期刊>Network, IEEE >Electronic document authentication
【24h】

Electronic document authentication

机译:电子文件认证

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Digital signature techniques such as the Rivest-Shamir-Adleman (RSA) scheme can be used to establish both the authenticity of a document and the identity of its originator. However, because of the computationally-intensive nature of the RSA algorithm, most digital signature schemes make use of a checksum technique to summarize or represent the document, and then digitally sign the checksum. Message authentication codes (MACs), based on the Data Encryption Standard (DES), are often used for this purpose. It is shown that cryptographic checksums that are intended to detect fraudulent messages must be on the order of 128 bits in length, and the ANSI X9.9-1986 message authentication standard is criticized on that basis. In addition, architectural arguments are advanced to illustrate the advantages of a checksum algorithm that is not based on the use of cryptography and does not require the use of a secret key. Manipulation detection codes (MDC) are defined as a class of checksum algorithms that can detect both accidental and malicious modifications of an electronic message or document, without requiring the use of a cryptographic key.
机译:诸如Rivest-Shamir-Adleman(RSA)方案之类的数字签名技术可用于建立文档的真实性和其创建者的身份。但是,由于RSA算法的计算量很大,大多数数字签名方案都使用校验和技术来汇总或表示文档,然后对校验和进行数字签名。为此,通常使用基于数据加密标准(DES)的消息身份验证代码(MAC)。结果表明,旨在检测欺诈性消息的加密校验和的长度必须在128位左右,并且在此基础上批评了ANSI X9.9-1986消息认证标准。此外,还提出了一些体系结构论证来说明校验和算法的优点,该校验和算法不基于加密技术,并且不需要使用秘密密钥。操纵检测代码(MDC)被​​定义为一类校验和算法,可以检测电子消息或文档的意外和恶意修改,而无需使用加密密钥。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号