首页> 外文期刊>IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications >A comparison of linear and mesh topologies-DQDB and the Manhattan street network
【24h】

A comparison of linear and mesh topologies-DQDB and the Manhattan street network

机译:线性拓扑和网格拓扑的比较-DQDB和曼哈顿街道网络

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The authors make a performance and reliability comparison of two networks that have been proposed for use as high-speed metropolitan area networks (MANs)-the Manhattan street network (MSNet) and the distributed queue dual bus (DQDB) network. Both networks use slotted access protocols and have the same number of links, transmitters, and receivers per node. The DQDB network has been adopted by the IEEE 802.6 committee as the metropolitan area network (MAN) standard. The authors demonstrate the relative superiority of the MSNet over the DQDB network. They show that the MSNet provides a much higher network throughput for a variety of traffic patterns-uniform and nonuniform. They also look at the reliability of both networks and show that the MSNet can survive more failures than the DQDB network and that failures cause a lesser performance degradation in the MSNet. It is also shown that higher-level mechanisms are required in the DQDB network to recover from link failures whereas deflection routing is sufficient in the MSNet.
机译:作者对两种被提议用作高速城域网(MAN)的网络(曼哈顿街道网络(MSNet)和分布式队列双总线(DQDB)网络)进行了性能和可靠性比较。这两个网络都使用时隙访问协议,并且每个节点具有相同数量的链路,发送器和接收器。 DQDB网络已被IEEE 802.6委员会采用为城域网(MAN)标准。作者展示了MSNet在DQDB网络上的相对优势。他们表明,MSNet为各种流量模式(均匀和非均匀)提供了更高的网络吞吐量。他们还研究了两个网络的可靠性,并表明MSNet可以比DQDB网络承受更多的故障,并且这些故障对MSNet的性能影响较小。还显示出DQDB网络中需要更高级别的机制来从链路故障中恢复,而偏转路由在MSNet中已足够。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号