首页> 外文期刊>Computer Architecture Letters >Comparing Stochastic and Deterministic Computing
【24h】

Comparing Stochastic and Deterministic Computing

机译:比较随机计算和确定性计算

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Technology scaling has raised the specter of myriads of cheap, but unreliable and/or stochastic devices that must be creatively combined to create a reliable computing system. This has renewed the interest in computing that exploits stochasticity—embracing, not combating the device physics. If a stochastic representation is used to implement a programmable general-purpose architecture akin to CPUs, GPUs, or FPGAs, the preponderance of evidence indicates that most of the system energy will be expended in communication and storage as opposed to computation. This paper presents an analytical treatment of the benefits and drawbacks of adopting a stochastic approach by examining the cost of representing a value. We show both scaling laws and costs for low precision representations. We also analyze the cost of multiplication implemented using stochastic versus deterministic approaches, since multiplication is the prototypical inexpensive stochastic operation. We show that the deterministic approach compares favorably to the stochastic approach when holding precision and reliability constant.
机译:技术的扩展已经带来了无数廉价,但不可靠和/或随机的设备的幽灵,必须将这些设备创造性地组合起来以创建可靠的计算系统。这重新激发了人们对利用随机性的计算的兴趣,即拥抱而不是破坏设备物理。如果使用随机表示来实现类似于CPU,GPU或FPGA的可编程通用体系结构,则大量证据表明,与计算相反,大部分系统能量将用于通信和存储。本文通过检查代表价值的成本,提出了采用随机方法的利弊的分析方法。对于低精度表示,我们同时显示了缩放定律和成本。我们还分析了使用随机方法和确定性方法实现的乘法成本,因为乘法是典型的廉价随机操作。我们表明,在保持精度和可靠性不变的情况下,确定性方法优于随机方法。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Computer Architecture Letters》 |2015年第2期|119-122|共4页
  • 作者

    Manohar Rajit;

  • 作者单位

    Cornell Tech, Cornell University, NY, New York;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号