首页> 外文期刊>Hydrological ProcHydrological Processesrnesses >Have applications of continuous rainfall–runoff simulation realized the vision for process-based flood frequency analysis?
【24h】

Have applications of continuous rainfall–runoff simulation realized the vision for process-based flood frequency analysis?

机译:连续降雨-径流模拟的应用是否实现了基于过程的洪水频率分析的愿景?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Keith Beven was amongst the first to propose and demonstrate a combination of conceptual rainfall–runoff modelling and stochastically generated rainfall data in what is known as the ‘continuous simulation’ approach for flood frequency analysis. The motivations included the potential to establish better links with physical processes and to avoid restrictive assumptions inherent in existing methods applied in design flood studies. Subsequently, attempts have been made to establish continuous simulation as a routine method for flood frequency analysis, particularly in the UK. The approach has not been adopted universally, but numerous studies have benefitted from applications of continuous simulation methods. This paper asks whether industry has yet realized the vision of the pioneering research by Beven and others. It reviews the generic methodology and illustrates applications of the original vision for a more physically realistic approach to flood frequency analysis through a set of practical case studies, highlighting why continuous simulation was useful and appropriate in each case. The case studies illustrate how continuous simulation has helped to offer users of flood frequency analysis more confidence about model results by avoiding (or exposing) bad assumptions relating to catchment heterogeneity, inappropriateness of assumptions made in (UK) industry-standard design event flood estimation methods, and the representation of engineered or natural dynamic controls on flood flows. By implementing the vision for physically realistic analysis of flood frequency through continuous simulation, each of these examples illustrates how more relevant and improved information was provided for flood risk decision-making than would have been possible using standard methods. They further demonstrate that integrating engineered infrastructure into flood frequency analysis and assessment of environmental change are also significant motivations for adopting the continuous simulation approach in practice. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
机译:基思·贝文(Keith Beven)率先提出并演示了概念性降雨径流模型与随机生成的降雨数据的组合,这就是所谓的“连续模拟”洪水频率分析方法。动机包括可能与物理过程建立更好的联系,并避免设计洪水研究中使用的现有方法固有的限制性假设。随后,已经尝试建立连续模拟作为洪水频率分析的常规方法,特别是在英国。该方法尚未被普遍采用,但是连续仿真方法的应用使许多研究受益。本文询问行业是否已经实现了Beven等人的开创性研究愿景。它回顾了通用方法,并通过一组实际案例研究说明了针对更实际的洪水频率分析方法的原始设想的应用,强调了为什么连续模拟在每种情况下都是有用且适当的。案例研究说明了通过避免(或暴露)与流域异质性有关的错误假设,(英国)行业标准设计事件洪水估算方法中的不恰当假设,连续模拟如何帮助洪水频率分析的用户提高对模型结果的信心,以及对洪水流量进行工程或自然动态控制的表示。通过实施通过连续模拟对洪水频率进行物理逼真的分析的愿景,这些示例均说明了与标准方法相比,如何为洪水风险决策提供更多相关和改进的信息。他们进一步证明,将工程基础设施集成到洪水频率分析和环境变化评估中也是在实践中采用连续模拟方法的重要动机。版权所有©2016 John Wiley&Sons,Ltd.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号