首页> 外文期刊>Hydro review >Destroying Snake River Dams: 'Lose-Lose' Logic
【24h】

Destroying Snake River Dams: 'Lose-Lose' Logic

机译:消灭蛇河水坝:“失落”逻辑

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Several years ago, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers took a look at whether four of its dams on the Snake River in eastern Washington should be breached to assist salmon passage. The Corps concluded dam breaching was a bad idea. It remains a bad idea today. Destroying the four dams and hydroelectric facilities in the name of fish recovery is a lose-lose proposition. The Pacific Northwest region would lose because dam removal will not recover fish runs. Its citizens would lose by suffering devastating economic effects. Industries that utilize the vital benefits of the remarkable Snake River system have an immense incentive to see real recovery of fish runs. We take offense to misleading statements that are not supported by science, economics, or experience. They brush aside real threats to our Northwest economy while glossing over uncertain benefits to fish. Dam removal advocates would nave you think it is easy to rebuild fish runs - take out a few dams and ... voila!
机译:几年前,美国陆军工程兵团研究了是否应突破华盛顿东部蛇河上的四个水坝,以协助鲑鱼通过。军团认为破坏大坝是一个坏主意。今天仍然是一个坏主意。以鱼类恢复的名义摧毁四个水坝和水力发电设施是一个输球的命题。西北太平洋地区将遭受损失,因为拆除大坝将无法恢复游鱼活动。其公民将遭受毁灭性的​​经济影响而遭受损失。利用非凡的Snake River系统的重大利益的行业具有巨大的动力,可以看到鱼类流产的真正恢复。我们对科学,经济学或经验不支持的误导性陈述感到冒犯。他们抛弃了对西北经济的真正威胁,同时掩盖了不确定的鱼类利益。拆除水坝的拥护者会认为您很容易重建鱼径-取出几座水坝,瞧!

著录项

  • 来源
    《Hydro review》 |2004年第1期|p.32|共1页
  • 作者

    R. Scott Corwin;

  • 作者单位

    Pacific Northwest Generating Cooperative (PNGC Power), 711 N.E. Halsey, Portland, OR 97232;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 发电、发电厂;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号