首页> 外文期刊>Hydro review >A Retrospective on the Oroville Facilities Relicensing: Making Collaboration Work
【24h】

A Retrospective on the Oroville Facilities Relicensing: Making Collaboration Work

机译:奥罗维尔设施使用许可回顾:使协作成为现实

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

When working toward a new Federal Energy Regulatory Commission operating license for its 762-MW Oroville Facilities hydroelectric project, the California Department of Water Resources collaborated extensively with the public. The lessons learned during the Oroville Facilities relicensing process are applicable to any hydro project owner using a collaborative approach to resolving complex resource issues. To negotiate a new operating license for its 762-MW Oroville Facilities hydroelectric project (formerly called Feather River), in December 2000 the California Department of Water Resources (DWR) requested to use the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (FERC) alternative licensing process (ALP). The original operating license for the Oroville Facilities project, on the Feather River in northern California, was issued in February 1957. DWR chose the ALP over the traditional licensing process (TLP) for two primary reasons. First, the ALP encourages greater public involvement, enabling the licensee and stakeholders to collaboratively design the consultation process and jointly propose license terms and conditions.
机译:在为其762兆瓦Oroville设施水力发电项目争取新的联邦能源管理委员会运营许可时,加利福尼亚州水资源部与公众进行了广泛的合作。在Oroville设施重新许可过程中吸取的教训适用于任何采用协作方式解决复杂资源问题的水电项目所有者。为了为其762兆瓦的Oroville设施水电项目(以前称为羽毛河)谈判新的运营许可证,2000年12月,加利福尼亚水利部(DWR)要求使用联邦能源管理委员会(FERC)的替代许可程序(ALP) )。 1957年2月,颁发了位于加利福尼亚北部羽毛河上的Oroville设施项目的原始运营许可证。DWR选择ALP而不是传统的许可流程(TLP),主要有两个原因。首先,ALP鼓励更多的公众参与,使被许可人和利益相关者能够共同设计咨询过程并共同提出许可条款和条件。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号