首页> 外文期刊>Human Resource Management Review >Best practices in developing, conducting, and evaluating inductive research
【24h】

Best practices in developing, conducting, and evaluating inductive research

机译:开发,开展和评估归纳研究的最佳实践

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

This editors' introductory article to the Human Resources Management Review special issue on inductive research methods aims not only to provide an overview of the four main articles, but to provide guidance to researchers and gatekeepers about how best to conduct such research. We address four specific goals in the current article. First, we present a brief overview of each of the four papers. Second, we provide a general background on deduction, induction, and abduction: what they are, how they are distinguished from one another and should be used in a complementary manner, and how our field has moved away from inductive toward deductive paradigms over the last five decades. Third, we shed further light (in the current representations of deductive versus inductive approaches in our collective published works, and what can/should be done to achieve a better balance between them as We move forward. Fourth, we offer several "best-practice" recommendations for how best to conduct and evaluate research that does not conform to the prevailing hypothetico-deductive model. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:这篇关于归纳研究方法的《人力资源管理评论》特刊的编辑介绍性文章不仅旨在概述四篇主要文章,而且还为研究人员和看门人提供有关如何最好地进行此类研究的指南。我们在当前文章中解决四个具体目标。首先,我们简要介绍这四篇论文。其次,我们提供了有关演绎,归纳和绑架的一般背景:它们是什么,它们如何彼此区分,应该以互补的方式使用,以及我们的领域在过去最后如何从归纳模式转向演绎范式五十年。第三,我们进一步阐明了(在我们集体出版的作品中,演绎法和归纳法的当前代表形式,以及随着我们的前进,可以/应该做些什么来实现它们之间的更好的平衡。第四,我们提供了几种“最佳实践” “关于如何最好地进行和评估不符合现行假设推论模型的研究的建议。(C)2016 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号