首页> 外文期刊>Human-Machine Systems, IEEE Transactions on >A Predictive Model for Use of an Assistive Robotic Manipulator: Human Factors Versus Performance in Pick-and-Place/Retrieval Tasks
【24h】

A Predictive Model for Use of an Assistive Robotic Manipulator: Human Factors Versus Performance in Pick-and-Place/Retrieval Tasks

机译:使用辅助机器人的预测模型:人为因素与拾取/放置/检索任务中的性能

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The goal of this study was to model the important individual differences to predict a user's performance when operating an assistive robotic manipulator for a general population. Prior research done led to the identification of ten potential human factors to be observed including dexterity (gross and fine), spatial abilities (orientation and visualization), visual acuity in each eye, visual perception, depth perception, reaction time, and working memory. Eighty-nine individuals completed a test battery of potential human factors and, then, completed several tasks using a robotic manipulator designed to simulate find-and-fetch/pick-and-place tasks. During interaction with the robot, time on task, number of moves, and number of moves per minute were recorded. We successfully developed statistical models predicting performance that revealed several important human factors. Speed of information processing, spatial ability, dexterity, and working memory were all seen to be significant predictors of task performance. For time on task, linear and polynomial models showed roughly similar predictive performance on unseen test data achieving root-mean-square percentage error of about 7.3%; for number of moves per minute, a polynomial model was best with 9.1% error; and for number of moves, a linear model was best with 12.8% error.
机译:这项研究的目的是对重要的个体差异进行建模,以预测针对一般人群的辅助机器人时的性能。先前的研究完成了对十种潜在人为因素的识别,包括敏捷度(粗略和精细),空间能力(定向和可视化),每只眼睛的视敏度,视觉感知,深度感知,反应时间和工作记忆。 89个人完成了一系列可能的人为因素的测试,然后使用设计用于模拟“查找与获取/拾取和放置”任务的机器人操纵器完成了多项任务。与机器人交互期间,记录了任务时间,移动次数和每分钟的移动次数。我们成功开发了预测性能的统计模型,该模型揭示了几个重要的人为因素。信息处理的速度,空间能力,灵活性和工作记忆力都被视为任务绩效的重要预测指标。对于任务时间,线性模型和多项式模型在看不见的测试数据上显示出大致相似的预测性能,均方根百分比误差约为7.3%。对于每分钟的移动次数,多项式模型最好,误差为9.1%;对于移动次数,线性模型最好,误差为12.8%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号