...
首页> 外文期刊>Human Factors >Vigilance and Signal Detection Theory: An Empirical Evaluation of Five Measures of Response Bias
【24h】

Vigilance and Signal Detection Theory: An Empirical Evaluation of Five Measures of Response Bias

机译:警惕性和信号检测理论:对五项反应偏见的经验评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Three experiments were conducted to determine which of five response bias indices (β, c, B″, B′_H, and B″_D) defined by the theory of signal detection provides the most effective measure of the observer's willingness to respond in a vigilance task. The results indicated that the traditional parametric bias index β was an inadequate measure of response bias in every respect, whereas the newer parametric measure c was the most effective of all five indices. When the three nonparametric measures (B″, B′_H, and B″_D) were examined separately, B″_D emerged as the most effective nonparametric index. We recommend that vigilance researchers use c rather than β to measure bias when a parametric model is involved and B″_D instead of B″ and B′_H when a nonparametric model is used.
机译:进行了三个实验,以确定信号检测理论定义的五个响应偏差指数(β,c,B”,B'_H和B” _D)中的哪一个提供了观察者警惕性响应意愿的最有效度量。任务。结果表明,传统的参数偏差指标β不能从各个方面来衡量响应偏差,而更新的参数指标c是所有五个指标中最有效的。当分别检查三个非参数量度(B”,B'_H和B''_ D)时,B''_ D成为最有效的非参数指标。我们建议警惕性研究人员在涉及参数模型时使用c而不是β来衡量偏差,在使用非参数模型时使用B''_ D代替B''和B'_H。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号