首页> 外文期刊>Human Dimensions of Wildlife >Recreation Participation and Conservation Attitudes: Differences Between Mail and Online Respondents in a Mixed-Mode Survey
【24h】

Recreation Participation and Conservation Attitudes: Differences Between Mail and Online Respondents in a Mixed-Mode Survey

机译:娱乐参与和保护态度:混合模式调查中的邮件和在线响应者之间的差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study reports a comparison of demographics, outdoor recreation activity patterns, and attitudes toward conservation issues collected via mail and online survey methods within a mixed-mode survey. Pennsylvania residents, randomly sampled by Survey Sampling, Inc., were invited in a pre-survey letter to complete the survey online, or through a paper survey mailed to their homes. Differences in outdoor recreation participation were generally small for wildlife-related activities, and were greater among non-wildlife-related outdoor recreation activities, with the Internet respondents generally reporting higher rates of participation. Analyses controlling for demographic variables showed a confounding influence on the relationships examined. Internet respondents tended to be younger, better educated, and more affluent. Conservation-related attitudes did not differ between the mail and online survey respondents and were more weakly related to demographic factors. Results suggest that online surveys can yield valid results when using appropriate sampling designs and implementing quality control procedures.
机译:这项研究报告了在混合模式调查中通过邮件和在线调查方法收集的人口统计学,户外休闲活动模式以及对保护问题态度的比较。由Survey Sampling,Inc.随机抽样的宾夕法尼亚州居民被邀请参加调查前信,以在线完成调查,或通过邮寄到其住所的纸质调查完成调查。在与野生动植物相关的活动中,户外休闲参与的差异通常较小,而在与非野生生物相关的户外休闲活动中,差异较大,互联网受访者的参与率普遍较高。控制人口统计学变量的分析显示了对所检查关系的混杂影响。互联网受访者往往更年轻,文化程度更高且更富裕。邮件和在线调查的受访者之间,与保护相关的态度没有差异,与人口因素的相关性较弱。结果表明,当使用适当的抽样设计并实施质量控制程序时,在线调查可以产生有效的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号