首页> 外文期刊>Human Development >Socialization and the Role of Power Assertion Commentary on Baumrind
【24h】

Socialization and the Role of Power Assertion Commentary on Baumrind

机译:社会化与鲍姆林德权力断言的作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Very little research has had as long-lasting and significant an impact on the field of developmental psychology as Diana Baumrind's work on parenting styles. Indeed the number of citations of that work [Baumrind, 1967, 1971, 1991] stretches into the 1,000s. The distinction between authoritarian, authoritative, and permissive parenting, which was such an important breakthrough in thinking 40 or more years ago, continues to be accepted as a meaningful way of conceptualizing different ways of parenting and the different outcomes associated with them. Common to these styles is the notion of control (or, in the case of permissive parenting, lack of control). And it is to control that Baumrind [this issue] has addressed an essay that forms a starting point for the present commentary.
机译:很少有研究能像戴安娜·鲍姆林德(Diana Baumrind)关于养育方式的工作那样对发展心理学领域产生持久而显着的影响。确实,该作品的引用次数[Baumrind,1967、1971、1991]已经扩展到了千分之几。独裁,权威和宽容育儿之间的区别是40年前或更长时间的思想突破,是一个有意义的方式,它是一种概念化的方法,用于概念化不同的父母养育方式以及与之相关的不同结果。这些样式的共同点是控制的概念(或在允许的育儿​​情况下缺乏控制)。可以控制的是,鲍姆林德[本期]发表了一篇文章,该文章构成了本评论的起点。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Human Development》 |2012年第2期|p.52-56|共5页
  • 作者

    Joan E. Grusec;

  • 作者单位

    University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont., Canada Department of Psychology University of Toronto Toronto, ON M5S 3G3 (Canada);

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    parenting styles; power assertion; socialization;

    机译:养育方式;权力主张;社会化;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号