首页> 外文期刊>Human Biology >Are Languages Really Independent from Genes? If Not, What Would a Genetic Bias Affecting Language Diversity Look Like?
【24h】

Are Languages Really Independent from Genes? If Not, What Would a Genetic Bias Affecting Language Diversity Look Like?

机译:语言真的独立于基因吗?如果不是,影响语言多样性的遗传偏见会是什么样?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

It is generally accepted that the relationship between human genes and language is very complex and multifaceted. This has its roots in the "regular" complexity governing the interplay among genes and between genes and environment for most phenotypes, but with the added layer of supra-ontogenetic and supra-individual processes defining culture. At the coarsest level, focusing on the species, it is clear that human-specific-but not necessarily faculty-specific-genetic factors subtend our capacity for language and a currently very productive research program is aiming at uncovering them. At the other end of the spectrum, it is uncontroversial that individual-level variations in different aspects related to speech and language have an important genetic component and their discovery and detailed characterization have already started to revolutionize the way we think about human nature. However, at the intermediate, glossogenetic/population level, the relationship becomes controversial, partly due to deeply ingrained beliefs about language acquisition and universality and partly because of confusions with a different type of gene-languages correlation due to shared history. Nevertheless, conceptual, mathematical and computational models-and, recently, experimental evidence from artificial languages and songbirds-have repeatedly shown that genetic biases affecting the acquisition or processing of aspects of language and speech can be amplified by population-level intergenerational cultural processes and made manifest either as fixed "universal" properties of language or as structured linguistic diversity. Here, I review several such models as well as the recently proposed case of a causal relationship between the distribution of tone languages and two genes related to brain growth and development, ASPM and Microcephalin, and I discuss the relevance of such genetic biasing for language evolution, change, and diversity. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
机译:人们普遍认为,人类基因与语言之间的关系非常复杂而且是多方面的。这源于“常规”复杂性,该复杂性控制着大多数表型的基因之间以及基因与环境之间的相互作用,但是具有定义了文化的超自然形成和超个体过程的附加层。在最粗略的层次上,着眼于物种,很明显,人类特定的因素(但不一定是教师特定的遗传因素)对我们的语言表达能力产生了影响,目前一项非常有成果的研究计划旨在发现它们。另一方面,与言语和语言相关的各个方面的个体差异具有重要的遗传成分,其发现和详细的特征已经开始彻底改变我们对人性的思维方式,这一点毫无争议。然而,在中间的,遗传发生/种群水平上,这种关系引起争议,部分是由于对语言习得和普遍性的根深蒂固的信念,部分是由于共享历史而与不同类型的基因语言相关性造成的混淆。然而,概念,数学和计算模型以及最近来自人工语言和鸣禽的实验证据反复表明,影响人口语言和言语方面习得或加工的遗传偏见可通过人口层面的代际文化过程来放大,并且表现为固定的语言“通用”属性或结构化的语言多样性。在这里,我回顾了几种这样的模型,以及最近提出的调性语言的分布与两个与大脑生长与发育相关的基因ASPM和Microcephalin之间的因果关系的案例,并讨论了这种遗传偏向与语言进化的相关性,变化和多样性。 [出版物摘要]

著录项

  • 来源
    《Human Biology》 |2011年第2期|p.279-296|共18页
  • 作者

    Dan Dediu;

  • 作者单位

    DAN DEDIU1,21 Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Wundtlaan 1, 6525 XD Nijmegen, the Netherlands.2 Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Nijmegen, Kapittelweg 29, 6525 EN, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.Correspondence to: Dan Dediu, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Wundtlaan 1, 6525 XD Nijmegen, the Netherlands. E-mail: dan.dediu@mpi.nl.Human Biology, April 2011, v. 83, no. 2, pp. 279-296.Copyright © 2011 Wayne State University Press, Detroit, Michigan 48201-1309;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号