首页> 外文期刊>The holocene >Comparing different calibration methods (WA/WA-PLS regression and Bayesian modelling) and different-sized calibration sets in pollen-based quantitative climate reconstruction
【24h】

Comparing different calibration methods (WA/WA-PLS regression and Bayesian modelling) and different-sized calibration sets in pollen-based quantitative climate reconstruction

机译:在基于花粉的定量气候重建中比较不同的校准方法(WA / WA-PLS回归和贝叶斯建模)和不同大小的校准集

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We compare a Bayesian modelling-based technique with weighted averaging (WA) and weighted averaging-partial least squares (WA-PLS) regression in pollen-based summer temperature transfer function calibration. We test the methods using a new, 113-sample calibration set from Estonia, Lithuania and European Russia, and a Holocene fossil pollen sequence from Lake Kharinei, a previously studied lake in northeast European Russia. We find WA-PLS to outperform WA, probably because of smaller edge-effect biases in the ends of the calibration set gradient. The Bayesian-based calibration models show further improved performance compared with WA-PLS in leave-one-out cross-validation, while additional h-block cross-validation shows the Bayesian method to be little affected by spatial autocorrelation. Comparison with independent climate proxies reveals, however, some clear biases in the Bayesian palaeotemperature reconstructions, likely reflecting in part some specific limitations of our calibration set. As the selected prior parameters can significantly affect both Bayesian cross-validation performance and reconstructions, there is a clear need to further test the Bayesian method in different geographic contexts and over different timescales, with special attention given to the selection of the most realistic priors in each situation. In general, our finding that statistically well-performing transfer functions may produce clearly differing palaeotemperature reconstructions urges caution in transfer function-based inferences. We additionally test a spatially restricted, 58-sample subset of the full I 13-sample calibration set. We find some reduced biases with the smaller set, likely because of complex, partially bimodal responses of several taxa along the longer temperature gradient, ill-suited for calibration methods assuming unimodal responses to climate.
机译:我们在基于花粉的夏季温度传递函数校准中将基于贝叶斯建模的技术与加权平均(WA)和加权平均偏最小二乘(WA-PLS)回归进行了比较。我们使用来自爱沙尼亚,立陶宛和欧洲俄罗斯的新的113个样品的校准集以及来自先前在俄罗斯东北部研究的哈里尼湖的全新世化石花粉序列测试了这些方法。我们发现WA-PLS的性能优于WA-PLS,这可能是因为校准集梯度的两端的边缘效应偏差较小。基于贝叶斯的校准模型在留一法交叉验证中显示出比WA-PLS进一步提高的性能,而其他h块交叉验证显示贝叶斯方法几乎不受空间自相关的影响。然而,与独立气候代理的比较表明,贝叶斯古温度重构中存在明显的偏差,这可能部分反映了我们校准集的某些特定局限性。由于所选先验参数会显着影响贝叶斯交叉验证性能和重构,因此显然需要在不同地理环境和不同时间范围内进一步测试贝叶斯方法,并特别注意选择最现实的先验参数。每种情况。一般而言,我们的发现统计上性能良好的传递函数可能会产生明显不同的古温度重构,因此在基于传递函数的推论中应谨慎行事。我们还测试了全部13个样本校准集的受空间限制的58个样本子集。我们发现,较小的集合会减少一些偏差,这可能是由于几个类群沿着较长的温度梯度的复杂的部分双峰响应所致,不适合假设气候对单峰响应的校准方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号