首页> 外文期刊>The holocene >Arctic sea-ice proxies: Comparisons between biogeochemical and micropalaeontological reconstructions in a sediment archive from Arctic Canada
【24h】

Arctic sea-ice proxies: Comparisons between biogeochemical and micropalaeontological reconstructions in a sediment archive from Arctic Canada

机译:北极海冰代理:加拿大北极沉积物中生物地球化学和微古生物学重建之间的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Boxcore 99LSSL-001 from the southwest Canadian Arctic Archipelago (68.095 degrees N, 114.186 degrees W), studied by multiproxy approaches (sea-ice diatom biomarker IP25, phytoplankton-based biomarker brassicasterol, biogenic silica, total organic carbon, dinoflagellate cysts = dinocysts, diatoms) and their applications (sea-ice index PBIP25, modern analogue technique (MAT) transfer functions), provides a chronologically constrained (Pb-210, Cs-137, two C-14 dates) palaeoenvironmental archive spanning AD 1625-1999 with which to compare and evaluate proxies frequently used in sea-ice reconstructions. Whereas diatoms are rare, PBIP25, biogenic silica and qualitative dinocyst approaches show good agreement, suggesting that palaeo sea-ice histories based on biomarker and microfossil techniques are robust in this region. These combined approaches show fluctuating long open water to marginal ice zone conditions (AD 1625-1740), followed by high-amplitude oscillations between long open water and extended spring/summer sea ice (AD 1740-1870). Greater ice cover (AD 1870-1970) precedes recent reductions in seasonal sea ice (AD 1970-1999). Dinocyst-based MAT, however, produces a low-amplitude signal lacking the nuances of other proxies, with most probable sea-ice reconstructions poorly correlating with biomarker-based histories. Explanations for this disagreement may include limited spatial coverage in the modern dinocyst distribution database for MAT and the broad environmental tolerances of polar dinocysts. Overall, PBIP25 provides the most detailed palaeo sea-ice signal, although its use in a shallow polar archipelago downcore setting poses methodological challenges. This proxy comparison demonstrates the limitations of palaeo sea-ice reconstructions and emphasizes the need for calibration studies tying modern microfossil and biogeochemical proxies to directly measured oceanographic parameters, as a springboard for robust quantitative palaeo studies.
机译:来自加拿大西南北极群岛(68.095度北,114.186度)的Boxcore 99LSSL-001,通过多代理方法研究(海冰硅藻生物标记IP25,浮游植物生物标记芸苔甾醇,生物硅,总有机碳,鞭毛藻囊肿=鞭毛囊肿,硅藻及其应用(海冰指数PBIP25,现代模拟技术(MAT)传递函数)提供了按时间顺序限制(Pb-210,Cs-137,两个C-14日期)的古环境档案,涵盖了AD 1625-1999,比较和评估在海冰重建中经常使用的代理。尽管硅藻很少见,但PBIP25,生物硅和定性的藻类方法显示出良好的一致性,这表明基于生物标记和微化石技术的古海冰历史在该地区是稳健的。这些组合的方法表明,长期开放水域波动至边缘冰区条件(公元1625-1740年),随后是长期开放水域和春/夏延长海冰之间的高振幅振荡(公元1740-1870年)。在最近的季节性海冰减少之前(公元1970-1999年),更大的冰盖面积(公元1870-1970年)就出现了。然而,基于藻囊的MAT产生的低振幅信号缺乏其他代理的细微差别,最可能的海冰重建与基于生物标记物的历史联系不佳。对于这种分歧的解释可能包括现代狄诺氏囊分布数据库中MAT的有限空间覆盖范围以及极地狄诺氏囊的广泛环境耐受性。总体而言,PBIP25提供了最详细的古海冰信号,尽管在浅极性群岛下游地区使用PBIP25带来了方法上的挑战。此代理比较证明了古海冰重建的局限性,并强调了将现代微化石和生物地球化学代理与直接测量的海洋学参数联系起来的校准研究的必要性,以此作为进行可靠的定量古研究的跳板。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号