...
首页> 外文期刊>History of Education: Journal of the History of Education Society >Australia’s 1988 Bicentennial: national history and multiculturalism in the primary school curriculum
【24h】

Australia’s 1988 Bicentennial: national history and multiculturalism in the primary school curriculum

机译:澳大利亚的1988年诞辰200周年:小学课程中的民族历史和多元文化主义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

As in many countries, such as Germany, Turkey, the United States and Japan the history/culture wars of the past two decades have increased public interest in what is taught in schools. This has resulted in rigorous debates in the general community, encouraged and sustained through regular media coverage. Partly as a response to this, History has been designated as a separate subject in the first wave of planning and implementation of the Australian National Curriculum. Two of the reasons for this include first, to recognise the importance of teaching historical skills as a distinct subject; and second there is an ongoing bipartisan political interest in privileging history disciplinary knowledge and content to ensure that national history narratives are taught to students. To contribute meaningfully towards the development and implementation of a National Curriculum, it is important to understand past curriculum constructions, so that the disciplinary knowledge and content of history remains independent, and not subsumed within current (or future) political trends. Based on examples of national history from the Queensland Social Studies syllabus and government endorsed sourcebooks in the lead-up to the 1988 Bicentennial of British colonisation of the Australian continent, this article examines the influence and role of multiculturalism in History teaching in primary schools. Particular attention is paid to Indigenous representations and British heritages, as an example of two groups that have often been represented as binaries to each other throughout Australian history. An analysis of the curriculum materials illuminates the differences between multiculturalism and history—highlighting how the two are merged at the expense of accurate historical knowledge and concepts, particularly in the area of national history. This study will demonstrate that as a result of the infiltration of multiculturalism into history content within the Social Studies curriculum, historical knowledge becomes silenced in the school curriculum - resulting in vague and sometimes historically inaccurate information being presented to students; and the privileging of certain types of multiculturalism.View full textDownload full textKeywordsmulticulturalism, history education, history/culture wars, curriculum, social studiesRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0046760X.2011.625557
机译:与许多国家(例如德国,土耳其,美国和日本)一样,过去二十年的历史/文化大战使公众对学校所教的内容越来越感兴趣。这导致了整个社区的激烈辩论,并通过定期的媒体报道得到鼓励和维持。作为对此的部分响应,在澳大利亚国家课程的第一轮规划和实施中,历史被指定为单独的主题。造成这种情况的两个原因包括:第一,认识到将历史技能作为一门独立学科的重要性。其次,两党之间一直在关注历史学科知识和内容的政治利益,以确保向学生传授国家历史叙事。为了对国家课程的开发和实施做出有意义的贡献,重要的是要了解过去的课程结构,以便学科知识和历史内容保持独立,并且不属于当前(或将来)的政治趋势。本文以昆士兰社会研究大纲中的国家历史为例,并在1988年英国殖民澳大利亚百年纪念百年纪念之前准备了政府认可的资料手册,考察了多元文化主义在小学历史教学中的影响和作用。特别要注意的是土著居民的代表和英国的遗产,例如在整个澳大利亚历史上经常被作为彼此的二进制代表的两个群体的例子。对课程材料的分析揭示了多元文化与历史之间的差异,强调了如何以准确的历史知识和概念为代价,特别是在国家历史领域,将两者融合。这项研究将证明,由于多元文化主义渗透到社会研究课程的历史内容中,学校课程中的历史知识变得沉默寡言-导致向学生提供的内容模糊不清,有时甚至是历史上不准确的信息;以及某些类型的多元文化主义的特权。查看全文下载全文关键字多元文化主义,历史教育,历史/文化大战,课程,社会研究相关var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线” ,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more“,发布编号:” ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b“};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0046760X.2011.625557

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号