首页> 外文期刊>Higher Education >Does the Affiliation of Universities to External Organizations Foster Diversity in Private Higher Education? Chile in Comparative Perspective
【24h】

Does the Affiliation of Universities to External Organizations Foster Diversity in Private Higher Education? Chile in Comparative Perspective

机译:大学与外部组织的隶属关系是否会促进私立高等教育的多样性?比较视角中的智利

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The expansion of private sectors of higher education has usually been regarded as a factor of diversification in higher education systems. Some of this differentiation has been found to arise from the affiliation of private institutions with organizations outside the field of higher education. This article reports the results of a study of this form of interorganizational relationship in private universities in Chile. Cases include universities founded or sponsored by religious, business and military organizations. A typology of private universities is proposed, on the basis of the forms affiliation (or its absence), was observed to take in the cases examined. Weak and strong forms of affiliation are described, and affiliated universities are compared to “proprietary” universities, i.e., those owned by individuals who govern them from their positions in the board of directors, and “independent” universities, in which governance lies with internal – academic or administrative – constituents. Albeit derived from the case of Chile, the typology could be applied to the analysis of private higher education in other national systems. The second part of the article seeks to ascertain whether affiliation operates as a source of differentiation in Chilean private higher education. Results show that, compared to the other types of private universities, the affiliated ones possess distinctive mission statements and declarations of principles, consistent with the orientations of their sponsor institutions, they tend to be smaller, and to have more full-time and better qualified faculty. Some receive financial support from their sponsor organization or its members. Distinctiveness was not found in indicators of prestige and student selectivity, nor in tuition levels, program offerings, curriculum design, the weight of research and graduate programs in their functions, student socioeconomic profile, and faculty involvement in governance. This is not to say that there are no differences in these dimensions among private universities: much diversity exists, but most of it cuts across all categories of interest for our study. Overall, affiliation does not appear to be a strong factor behind the diversification that exists in the Chilean private university sector.
机译:私立高等教育机构的扩张通常被认为是高等教育系统多元化的一个因素。已经发现这种差异的一部分是由于私立机构与高等教育领域以外的组织的隶属关系引起的。本文报告了智利私立大学中这种形式的组织间关系研究的结果。案例包括由宗教,商业和军事组织创立或赞助的大学。提出了私立大学的类型学,根据形式(或不存在隶属关系)对所考察的案例进行观察。描述了弱而强的从属关系,并将附属大学与“专有”大学(即由其在董事会中任职的个人所拥有的大学)和“独立”大学(其治理与内部–学术或行政–选民。尽管源于智利的案例,但该类型学可以应用于其他国家系统中私立高等教育的分析。本文的第二部分试图确定从属关系是否是智利私立高等教育中差异化的源泉。结果表明,与其他类型的私立大学相比,隶属大学具有独特的使命宣言和原则宣言,与其发起机构的定位相一致,它们的规模较小,并且其全日制大学和更高素质的大学学院。有些从赞助商组织或其成员那里获得财务支持。在声望和学生选择能力的指标,学费水平,课程设置,课程设计,研究和研究生课程在其功能,学生的社会经济概况以及教师参与治理方面的权重等指标中都没有发现与众不同。这并不是说私立大学在这些方面没有任何区别:存在很多多样性,但其中大多数涉及我们研究的所有兴趣类别。总体而言,从属关系似乎并不是智利私立大学部门多元化背后的重要因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号