首页> 外文期刊>Heat and mass transfer >Comparative study of radiometric and calorimetric methods for total hemispherical emissivity measurements
【24h】

Comparative study of radiometric and calorimetric methods for total hemispherical emissivity measurements

机译:总半球发射率测量的辐射法和量热法比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Accurate knowledge of infrared emissivity is important in applications such as surface temperature measurements by infrared thermography or thermal balance for building walls. A comparison of total hemispherical emissivity measurement was performed by two laboratories: the Laboratoire National de Métrologie et d’Essais (LNE) and the Centre d’Études et de Recherche en Thermique, Environnement et Systèmes ( CERTES). Both laboratories performed emissivity measurements on four samples, chosen to cover a large range of emissivity values and angular reflectance behaviors. The samples were polished aluminum (highly specular, low emissivity), bulk PVC (slightly specular, high emissivity), sandblasted aluminum (diffuse surface, medium emissivity), and aluminum paint (slightly specular surface, medium emissivity). Results obtained using five measurement techniques were compared. LNE used a calorimetric method for direct total hemispherical emissivity measurement [1], an absolute reflectometric measurement method [2], and a relative reflectometric measurement method. CERTES used two total hemispherical directional reflectometric measurement methods [3, 4]. For indirect techniques by reflectance measurements, the total hemispherical emissivity values were calculated from directional hemispherical reflectance measurement results using spectral integration when required and directional to hemispherical extrapolation. Results were compared, taking into account measurement uncertainties; an added uncertainty was introduced to account for heterogeneity over the surfaces of the samples and between samples. All techniques gave large relative uncertainties for a low emissive and very specular material (polished aluminum), and results were quite scattered. All the indirect techniques by reflectance measurement gave results within ±0.01 for a high emissivity material. A commercial aluminum paint appears to be a good candidate for producing samples with medium level of emissivity (about 0.4) and with good uniformity of emissivity values (within ±0.015).
机译:准确了解红外发射率在诸如红外热像仪测量表面温度或建筑物墙壁的热平衡等应用中很重要。两个实验室对总半球发射率的测量结果进行了比较:国家实验室和实验室,以及环境与系统研究中心(CERTES)。两个实验室都对四个样品进行了发射率测量,选择这些样品以覆盖大范围的发射率值和角反射率行为。样品为抛光铝(高镜面反射率,低发射率),散装PVC(微镜面反射率,高发射率),喷砂铝(漫射表面,中等发射率)和铝涂料(微镜面表面,中等发射率)。比较了使用五种测量技术获得的结果。 LNE使用量热法直接进行总半球发射率测量[1],绝对反射法测量方法[2]和相对反射法测量方法。 CERTES使用了两种全半球方向反射测量方法[3,4]。对于通过反射率测量的间接技术,需要时使用频谱积分从定向半球反射率测量结果中计算总半球发射率值,并根据半球外推方向进行计算。比较结果,并考虑到测量的不确定性;引入了额外的不确定性,以解释样品表面以及样品之间的异质性。对于低发射率和非常镜面的材料(抛光铝),所有技术都给出了较大的相对不确定性,并且结果相当分散。对于高发射率材料,所有通过反射率测量的间接技术得出的结果都在±0.01以内。商业铝涂料似乎是生产中等发射率(约0.4)和发射率值均匀性(在±0.015以内)的样品的理想选择。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Heat and mass transfer》 |2018年第5期|1415-1425|共11页
  • 作者单位

    CERTES, Université Paris-Est,THEMACS Ingénierie;

    Laboratoire National de Métrologie et d’Essais (LNE);

    Laboratoire Interuniversitaire des Systèmes Atmosphériques (LISA), UMR CNRS 7583, Université Paris-Est Créteil et Université Paris-Diderot;

    Laboratoire National de Métrologie et d’Essais (LNE);

    CERTES, Université Paris-Est;

    CERTES, Université Paris-Est;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 02:59:51

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号