首页> 外文期刊>Heart >Improvement of stress LVEF rather than rest LVEF after coronary revascularisation in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy and viable myocardium
【24h】

Improvement of stress LVEF rather than rest LVEF after coronary revascularisation in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy and viable myocardium

机译:缺血性心肌病和存活心肌患者冠状动脉血运重建后应激性LVEF改善而不是静息LVEF

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: To evaluate prospectively the response of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) to high dose dobutamine infusion in patients showing substantial viability, with and without improved resting LVEF after revascularisation. Methods: Before and 9-12 months after revascularisation, 50 patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy (LVEF 32 (8)%) and substantial myocardial viability (≥ 4 viable segments) underwent radionuclide ventriculography and dobutamine stress echocardiography. Patients were divided into group 1, patients with, and group 2, patients without significant improvement in resting LVEF (≥ 5% by radionuclide ventriculography) after revascularisation. The response of LVEF during dobutamine stress echocardiography was compared in these two groups. Results: Groups 1 and 2 were comparable in baseline characteristics, resting LVEF, and number of viable segments (mean (SD) 7 (4) v 6 (2), not significant). After revascularisation, the LVEF response during dobutamine stress echocardiography improved significantly in both groups (group 1, 34 (10)% to 56 (8)%; group 2, 32 (10)% to 46 (11)%; both p < 0.001). Interestingly, although resting LVEF did not improve in group 2, peak stress LVEF after revascularisation did (p < 0.001). Group 1 patients had, however, a greater increase in peak stress LVEF (group 1, 22 (10)%; group 2, 13 (9)%; p < 0.01). New York Heart Association and Canadian Cardiovascular Society classes decreased in both groups. Conclusions: Although patients with viable myocardium did not always have improved rest LVEF after revascularisation, peak stress LVEF improved. Assessment of improvement of resting function may not be the ideal end point to evaluate successful revascularisation.
机译:目的:前瞻性评估显示实质生存力的患者左心室射血分数(LVEF)对高剂量多巴酚丁胺输注的反应,血运重建后静息LVEF有无改善。方法:在血运重建之前和之后的9-12个月,对50例缺血性心肌病(LVEF 32(8)%)且具有实质性心肌生存力(≥4个可行区段)的患者进行了放射性核素心室描记和多巴酚丁胺负荷超声心动图检查。将患者分为血运重建后的静息LVEF(经放射性核素心室描记法≥5%)无明显改善的第1、2组和第2组。在这两组中比较了多巴酚丁胺负荷超声心动图期间LVEF的反应。结果:第1组和第2组在基线特征,静息LVEF和可行节段数方面具有可比性(平均值(SD)7(4)对6(2),无统计学意义)。血运重建后,两组中多巴酚丁胺负荷超声心动图检查期间的LVEF反应均显着改善(第1组,34(10)%至56(8)%;第2组,32(10)%至46(11)%;两者p <0.001 )。有趣的是,尽管第2组静息LVEF并未改善,但血运重建后的峰值应力LVEF却有所改善(p <0.001)。但是,第1组患者的峰值应力LVEF增加更大(第1组,22(10)%;第2组,13(9)%; p <0.01)。两组的纽约心脏协会和加拿大心血管学会课程均减少。结论:尽管心肌梗死患者在血运重建后的静息LVEF并不总是得到改善,但峰值应激LVEF有所改善。评估静息功能改善可能不是评估成功血运重建的理想终点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号