...
首页> 外文期刊>Heart >Prognosis of patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy after coronary revascularisation: relation to viability and improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction
【24h】

Prognosis of patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy after coronary revascularisation: relation to viability and improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction

机译:冠状动脉血运重建后缺血性心肌病患者的预后:与生存力和左心室射血分数改善的关系

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: In patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy and viable myocardium, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) does not always improve after revascularisation. Whether this may affect prognosis is unclear. Objective: To evaluate the prognosis of viable patients with and without improvement of LVEF after coronary revascularisation.rnMethods: Before revascularisation, radionuclide ventri-culography (RNV) and dobutamine stress echocardiogra-phy were performed to assess LVEF and myocardial viability, respectively. Nine to 12 months after revascularisation, LVEF improvement was assessed by RNV. Patients were divided into three groups: group 1, viable patients with LVEF improvement (n = 27); group 2, viable patients without LVEF improvement (n = 15), group 3, non-viable patients (n = 48). Cardiac events were evaluated during a 4-year follow-up. Results: After revascularisation, the mean (SD) LVEF improved from 32 (9)% to 42 (10)% in group 1, but did not change significantly in group 2 and in group 3, p<0.001 by analysis of variance (ANOVA). Heart failure symptoms improved in both groups 1 (mean (SD) NYHA class from 3.1 (0.9) to 1.7 (0.7)) and 2 (from 3.2 (0.7) to 1.7 (0.9)), but not in group 3 (from 2.8 (1.0) to 2.7 (0.5)), p<0.001 by ANOVA. During follow-up, the cardiac event rate was low (4%) in group 1, intermediate (21%) in group 2 and high (33%) in group 3 (p = 0.01). Conclusion: The best prognosis after revascularisation may be expected in those viable patients whose LVEF improves. Conversely, viable patients without functional improvement have an intermediate prognosis.
机译:背景:在患有缺血性心肌病和存活心肌的患者中,血运重建后左心室射血分数(LVEF)并不总是改善。目前尚不清楚这是否会影响预后。目的:评估冠状动脉血运重建后LVEF是否改善的生存患者。方法:在血运重建之前,分别进行放射性核素心室造影(RNV)和多巴酚丁胺负荷超声心动图检查以评估LVEF和心肌生存力。血运重建后的9至12个月,RNV评估了LVEF的改善。患者分为三组:第1组,LVEF改善的存活患者(n = 27);第2组,无LVEF改善的存活患者(n = 15),第3组,无存活的患者(n = 48)。在4年的随访期间评估了心脏事件。结果:血运重建后,第1组的平均(SD)LVEF从32(9)%提高到42(10)%,但在第2组和第3组中没有显着变化,通过方差分析(p <0.001) )。心衰症状在第1组(平均(SD)NYHA级从3.1(0.9)增至1.7(0.7))和2(从3.2(0.7)增至1.7(0.9))均得到改善,但在第3组中没有改善(从2.8( 1.0)至2.7(0.5)),通过ANOVA得出p <0.001。在随访期间,第1组的心脏事件发生率低(4%),第2组中的心脏事件发生率(21%),第3组中的高心脏事件发生率(33%)(p = 0.01)。结论:血运重建后LVEF改善的患者有望获得最佳预后。相反,没有功能改善的存活患者预后中等。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Heart》 |2009年第15期|1273-1277|共5页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Cardiovascular Disease, San Giovanni- Addolorata Hospital, Rome, Italy Department of Cardiovascular Disease, San Giovanni-Addolorata Hospital, Via dell' Amba Aradam 8, 00184 Rome, Italy;

    Department of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands;

    Department of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands;

    Department of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands;

    Department of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands;

    Department of Cardiovascular Disease, San Giovanni- Addolorata Hospital, Rome, Italy;

    Department of Medicine University of Queensland, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia;

    Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号