【24h】

Start to finish

机译:开始完成

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Applicability Many in the US will be disappointed by PHMSA's response to appeals against the contentious rulemaking on the applicability of the Hazardous Materials Regulations. Some accommodation has been offered, but many concerns remain unaddressed. When the Research and Special Programs Administration (RSPA) issued its final rule under docket HM-223 in October 2003, many in the US hazardous materials transport business were appalled at the prospect that their operations could end up being regulated not by the Department of Transport (DOT) but by the Occupational and Safety Health Administration (OSHA) or, worse, the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). A flood of appeals against the ruling landed on RSPA's desks in DC, causing implementation to be delayed and giving the regulators quite a headache. The depth of feeling against the rulemaking was apparent at various industry meetings - notably the Dangerous Goods Advisory Council (DGAC) annual conference and the Council on the Safe Transportation of Hazardous Articles (COSTHA) congress - as was reported in previous issues of the Bulletin, and still reverberates today.
机译:适用范围美国PHMSA对针对危险物质法规适用性的有争议规则制定提出的上诉,将令美国许多人感到失望。提供了一些住宿,但许多问题仍未解决。当研究与特殊项目管理局(RSPA)于2003年10月根据卷宗HM-223颁布最终规则时,许多美国危险品运输企业对他们的运营最终可能不受运输部监管的情况感到震惊。 (DOT),但由美国职业安全健康管理局(OSHA)或更糟糕的是由美国环境保护署(EPA)提供。针对该裁定的大量申诉落到了RSPA在华盛顿特区的办公桌上,导致实施工作被推迟,并使监管机构颇为头痛。在各行业会议上,尤其是在危险品咨询委员会(DGAC)年度会议和危险物品安全运输理事会(COSTHA)大会上,人们对规则制定的强烈感觉是显而易见的。至今仍在回荡。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Hazardous cargo bulletin》 |2005年第5期|p.17-19|共3页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 水路运输;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 01:41:53

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号