...
首页> 外文期刊>Harvard Journal of Law and Technology >Construing Patent Claims According to Their 'Interpretive Community': A Call for an Attorney-Plus-Artisan Perspective
【24h】

Construing Patent Claims According to Their 'Interpretive Community': A Call for an Attorney-Plus-Artisan Perspective

机译:根据“解释性社区”解释专利权主张:呼吁律师和工匠的观点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Determination of the scope of a patented invention is one of the most contentious and difficult tasks of modern patent law. Claims-numbered clauses at the end of a patent - are meant to provide notice of what a patent covers and to describe a patented invention in a way that distinguishes it from prior art. Because of claims' centrality to determinations of patent scope and patent validity, the stakes in trying to improve the predictability of claim construction are large. Patents play a critical role in modern business planning and finance. Moreover, as with other types of intellectual property, the importance of patents appears to be increasing: recently, the number of United States patents issued each year has grown faster than the real gross domestic product. The pace and breadth of modern patenting has fed concerns that overlapping or fragmented patent rights may act to retard innovation rather than "promote .. . Progress."
机译:确定专利发明的范围是现代专利法中最有争议和最困难的任务之一。专利末尾的权利要求编号的条款旨在提供专利覆盖范围的通知,并以一种区别于现有技术的方式描述专利发明。由于权利要求对于确定专利范围和专利有效性的重要性,因此试图提高权利要求结构的可预测性的风险很大。专利在现代商业计划和财务中起着至关重要的作用。此外,与其他类型的知识产权一样,专利的重要性似乎正在增加:最近,每年颁发的美国专利数量的增长速度快于实际国内生产总值。现代专利的步伐和广度引起了人们的关注,即重叠或分散的专利权可能会阻碍创新,而不是“促进……进步”。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号