首页> 外文期刊>Group decision and negotiation >Does Paying Back Pay Off? Effects of Reciprocity and Economic Outcomes on Trust Emergence in Negotiations
【24h】

Does Paying Back Pay Off? Effects of Reciprocity and Economic Outcomes on Trust Emergence in Negotiations

机译:还清还清吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In two studies (n(1) = 359; n(2) = 455), we investigated the effects of reciprocal counterpart behavior and economic negotiation outcomes on interpersonal trust in dyadic negotiations. Moreover, counterparts' power was considered as moderating factor. Using an experimental vignette approach, participants in both studies read a negotiation scenario, and were asked to imagine having conducted this negotiation. As part of the scenarios, we manipulated (a) counterpart's bargaining power (high-low; only Study 1), (b) positive (high-low) and (c) negative reciprocal counterpart behavior (escalating-high-low), and (d) the economic negotiation outcome for the actor (advantageous-equal-disadvantageous; only Study 2). Results show that participants reported higher trust in the counterpart after positive reciprocal counterpart behavior, whereas escalating negative reciprocal counterpart behavior and disadvantageous economic outcomes reduced trust. However, the negative effect of escalating counterpart behavior was rather low when counterpart power was high. Implications of these results are relevant for sustainable trust development and long-term business relationships.
机译:在两项研究(n(1)= 359; n(2)= 455)中,我们调查了对等对方行为和经济谈判结果对二元谈判中人际信任的影响。此外,同行的权力被认为是调节因素。使用实验性小插图方法,两个研究的参与者都阅读了一个协商方案,并被要求想象已经进行了该协商。作为场景的一部分,我们操纵了(a)对方的议价能力(高-低;仅研究1),(b)积极的(高-低)和(c)消极的对方对应行为(从高到低-递增),以及(d)参与者的经济谈判结果(有利-相等-不利;仅研究2)。结果显示,参与者在对等的对等行为为正后,对对方的信任度更高,而对等的对等行为为负面,经济结果恶化则降低了信任度。但是,当对方权力较高时,升级对方行为的负面影响就很小。这些结果的含义与可持续信托发展和长期业务关系有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号