首页> 外文期刊>Global trade and customs journal >Trade Agreements and Legal Services: An Anatomy of the GATS and Preferential Trade Arrangements
【24h】

Trade Agreements and Legal Services: An Anatomy of the GATS and Preferential Trade Arrangements

机译:贸易协定和法律服务:《服务贸易总协定》和特惠贸易安排的剖析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

There is little doubt that the past two decades have seen an extraordinary advance in the globalization of the world's economies. In this context, the legal services play a crucial role in facilitating business and form a vital part of the infrastructure that underpins world commerce. As a result, this service sector has experienced continuous growth over the last ten years. However, the regulation of legal services in most jurisdictions did not follow the same evolution, which results in restrictions on cross-border legal practice. Yet economic growth and globalization of economies increasingly require the adaptation of the regulation of legal services. In most instances they take place in the context of trade agreements. Until recently to the exception of the EU and the NAFTA, the liberalization of trade in services took place within the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS). However, the last decade has seen a proliferation of Preferential Trade Agreement (PTAs), which contain liberalization of trade services, including legal services. Such evolution leads to the coexistence of the GATS and the PTAs. The objective of this article is to analyse the interaction of these agreements in the context of the liberalization of trade in legal services using four principles of trade liberalization: the transparency; the non-discrimination; the avoidance of unnecessary restrictions; the recognition.
机译:毫无疑问,在过去的二十年中,世界经济全球化取得了非凡的进步。在这种情况下,法律服务在促进业务发展中起着至关重要的作用,并构成了支撑世界贸易的基础设施的重要组成部分。结果,该服务部门在过去十年中经历了持续增长。但是,大多数司法管辖区对法律服务的监管并没有遵循相同的发展趋势,这导致对跨境法律实践的限制。然而,经济增长和经济全球化日益要求对法律服务的监管进行调整。在大多数情况下,它们是在贸易协定的背景下发生的。直到最近,除欧盟和北美自由贸易协定外,服务贸易自由化都是在《服务贸易总协定》(GATS)中进行的。但是,最近十年来,《特惠贸易协定》(PTA)激增,其中包括贸易服务的自由化,包括法律服务。这种发展导致了GATS和PTA的共存。本文的目的是使用贸易自由化的四个原则在法律服务贸易自由化的背景下分析这些协议的相互作用。不歧视;避免不必要的限制;认可。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Global trade and customs journal》 |2014年第5期|223-242|共20页
  • 作者

    Giles Muller;

  • 作者单位

    Lic. jur. (Fribourg University), LL.M (Lausanne University), Ph.D (Neuchatel University);

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号