首页> 外文期刊>Global public health >Health system’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic in conflict settings: Policy reflections from Palestine
【24h】

Health system’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic in conflict settings: Policy reflections from Palestine

机译:卫生系统对Covid-19发生冲突环境的回应:巴勒斯坦的政策思考

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

As the COVID-19 pandemic spreads, concerns are particularly serious in conflict and humanitarian settings. Tackling the pandemic in those countries is challenging due to the fragility of socioeconomic and health systems. Palestine is one of those countries that is facing compounding challenges, instability, fragility, living conditions, poverty, and mobility, all of which are caused by multifactorial etiology. The Pandemic shows triple tragedies; virus (COVID-19 Pandemic), ongoing Israeli occupation (Politics), and Intra-Palestinian divide (Policies). Yet, Palestine's response to the pandemic is outperforming many countries in the region. The early preventative lockdown measures in the West Bank found effective and not overwhelming the already over-stretched health system. While in the Gaza Strip, the response was slow. Prisoners, labours, besieged people, socioeconomic-disadvantaged classes, and refugees were put at additional high risk. Nonetheless, measures taken were unconsolidated in both regions largely due to the political factors. A little collaboration and inter-agency task forces in preparedness and response was observed, and the mechanisms and governance remain ambiguous. A consolidated and evidence-based nation-wide plan is required, whereby state and non-state actors have a clear and transparent exit strategy. A new thinking approach to promote the public health system and evidence-informed policies in Palestine is an urgent national priority.
机译:随着Covid-19大流行蔓延,担忧在冲突和人道主义环境中特别严重。应对这些国家的大流行因社会经济和卫生系统的脆弱而挑战。巴勒斯坦是那些面临着复杂挑战,不稳定,脆弱性,生活条件,贫困和移动性的国家之一,所有这些都是由多因素病因引起的。大流行显示了三重悲剧;病毒(Covid-19大流行),正在进行的以色列职业(政治)和巴勒斯坦内部分裂(政策)。然而,巴勒斯坦对大流行的回应是该地区许多国家的表现。西岸的早期预防锁定措施发现有效,而不是压倒性的过度疲劳的卫生系统。在加沙地带,回应很慢。囚犯,劳动力,围困的人,社会经济弱势课程和难民额外高风险。尽管如此,由于政治因素,在这两个地区采取的措施。观察到一点合作和机构间工作队,并进行了准备和反应,机制和治理仍然含糊不清。需要综合和基于证据的全国范围计划,其中国家和非国家行为者具有明确透明的退出策略。促进巴勒斯坦公共卫生系统和证据知情政策的新思维方式是一个紧急的国家优先事项。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Global public health》 |2020年第8期|1244-1256|共13页
  • 作者单位

    Univ Basel Swiss Trop & Publ Hlth Inst Basel Switzerland|Council Hlth Res Dev Geneva Switzerland|An Najah Natl Univ Fac Med & Hlth Sci Nablus Palestine;

    Univ Coll London UCL London England;

    An Najah Natl Univ Fac Med & Hlth Sci Nablus Palestine;

    Gaza Community Mental Hlth Programme Gaza Palestine;

    NHS Fdn Trust Great Ormond St Hosp Children London England|Univ Coll London UCL London England|Women Deliver Org New York NY USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Health systems; conflict settings; COVID-19; Palestine;

    机译:卫生系统;冲突设置;Covid-19;巴勒斯坦;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号