首页> 外文期刊>Global Change, Peace & Security >World state or global governmentality? Constitutive power and resistance in a post-imperial world
【24h】

World state or global governmentality? Constitutive power and resistance in a post-imperial world

机译:是世界国家还是全球政府?后帝国时代的宪法力量和抵抗

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This article addresses recent theoretical discussion about the state under conditions of globalisation, focusing in particular on recently popular 'world state' theory, as articulated by Martin Shaw and Alexander Wendt. It suggests that while world state theory is useful to the extent that it historicises the function of the state, it can be challenged for its uncritical approach to the question of how state power is actually constituted. To make this argument, the article refers first to an emerging Marxist critique that focuses on liberal hypocrisy and the role of imperial violence in the formation of the world state. However, while this approach reveals the elision of many forms of violence in world state theory, it shares world state theory's tendency to avoid exploring the role of more constitutive forms of power. Challenging this view, the article turns to Foucault's theory of governmentality and some recent applications of it to Imperialism, Empire, and the War on Terror. These works speak not only to the importance of governmental reason in determining modes of sovereignty but encourage us to adopt an open-minded attitude towards the sorts of resistances it might provoke.
机译:本文讨论了关于全球化条件下国家的最新理论讨论,特别是马丁·肖(Martin Shaw)和亚历山大·温特(Alexander Wendt)阐述的最新流行的“世界状态”理论。它表明,虽然世界国家理论在一定程度上使国家功能具有历史意义时是有用的,但由于它对解决国家权力实际上是如何构成的问题的非批判性方法,可以受到挑战。为了提出这一论点,本文首先提到了一种新兴的马克思主义批评,其重点是自由主义的伪善和帝国暴力在世界国家形成中的作用。但是,尽管这种方法揭示了世界状态理论中许多形式暴力的省略,但它也具有世界状态理论倾向于避免探索更多构成性权力的作用的趋势。对此观点提出了挑战,文章转向了福柯的政府性理论及其在帝国主义,帝国主义和反恐战争中的最新应用。这些著作不仅说明了政府理性在确定主权模式中的重要性,而且鼓励我们对它可能引起的种种阻力采取开明的态度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号