...
首页> 外文期刊>Global Change, Peace & Security: formerly Pacifica Review: Peace, Security & Global Change >Fractured futures: Indonesian political reform and West Timorese manganese mining
【24h】

Fractured futures: Indonesian political reform and West Timorese manganese mining

机译:期货破裂:印尼政治改革和西帝汶锰矿开采

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This paper examines Indonesia's democratic state capacity-building in terms of transformations in West Timor, particularly around manganese mining. It is structured on the basis of three complementary sets of arguments. Firstly, democratic capacity-building is essentially a power-driven process as it seeks to re-arrange the way in which power is distributed. This process is shaped by the relative capabilities of a variety of societal interests struggling to dominate the control of state power at multiple sites of a highly competitive ‘field of power’. Secondly, Indonesia's democratic decentralisation experience has produced uneven results, both between and within provinces. This is largely because the dynamic of the reform process is determined by the relative capabilities of competing social forces to engage in the political landscape and influence revenue generation and resource management policies. Thirdly, manganese mining, which has recently emerged as a quick method of revenue generation in resource-poor West Timor, provides an important case study that reflects the structural dynamics of state (in)capacity.View full textDownload full textKeywordsIndonesia, West Timor, statehood, democratisation, governance, participation, resource extraction, conflict, globalisation, communityRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14781158.2012.678990
机译:本文从西帝汶的转型,特别是围绕锰矿开采的角度,研究了印尼的民主国家能力建设。它是基于三组互补的论证构成的。首先,民主能力建设在本质上是一个权力驱动的过程,因为它试图重新安排权力分配的方式。这个过程是由各种社会利益的相对能力所决定的,这些社会利益试图在竞争激烈的“权力领域”的多个站点上主导国家权力的控制。其次,印度尼西亚的民主权力下放经验在各省之间和省内产生了不平衡的结果。这在很大程度上是因为改革过程的动态性是由竞争的社会力量参与政治格局并影响创收和资源管理政策的相对能力所决定的。第三,最近在资源匮乏的西帝汶作为一种快速的创收方法而出现的锰矿开采,提供了一个重要的案例研究,反映了国家能力的结构动态。查看全文下载全文关键字印度尼西亚,西帝汶,国家,民主化,治理,参与,资源提取,冲突,全球化,社区,more“,pubid:” ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b“};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14781158.2012.678990

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号