首页> 外文期刊>The Geographical Journal >Groundwater governmentality: hegemony and technologies of resistance in Rajasthan's (India) groundwater governance
【24h】

Groundwater governmentality: hegemony and technologies of resistance in Rajasthan's (India) groundwater governance

机译:地下水治理:拉贾斯坦邦(印度)地下水治理中的霸权和抵抗技术

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Globally, decentralisation has become the dominant paradigm for environmental governance. This paper explores the linkages between green governmentality approaches to subjectivity and Gramscian notions of hegemony to examine recent efforts in Rajasthan, India to decentralise groundwater governance through targeted formal regulations and outreach activities, such as water awareness campaigns (Jal Abhiyaan). The latter seeks to alter the beliefs and practices of farmers by institutionalising their support for state groundwater conservation efforts, including privatisation. The paper draws on household surveys and interviews with farmers and government agents to examine the relationship between the political economic motivations for and practices of state subject-making and differential resistance to these efforts based on farmers' multiple subject positions. Findings suggest, first, that the state is motivated through its monetary and advisory relationship with donor agencies, such as the World Bank. Through both outreach activities and coercion, it attempts to gain 'consent' for its proposals, which devolve state control rather than truly decentralising decision-making, to make self-conducting and willing subjects of specifically neoliberal groundwater conservation. But, second, these attempts are being resisted by some farmers through protests, informal discussions, non-participation, and the collectivisation of access to groundwater and irrigation through irrigation partnerships. Third, resistance to these efforts, or support for them, is different between farmers based on their multiple subjectivities (caste, class and ecological conditions). The paper advances both our understanding of the processes of environmental subject-making and of the devolution of environmental governance, by integrating the lessons from governmentality and Gramscian approaches to social power and subjectivity. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
机译:在全球范围内,权力下放已成为环境治理的主要范例。本文探讨了绿色政府性主观方法与葛兰西霸权概念之间的联系,以研究印度拉贾斯坦邦最近通过有针对性的正式法规和诸如水意识运动(Jal Abhiyaan)之类的外联活动将地下水治理权力下放的努力。后者试图通过使农民对包括私有化在内的国家地下水保护工作的支持制度化来改变农民的观念和做法。本文利用家庭调查以及对农民和政府机构的访谈,考察了国家主体制定的政治经济动机和实践与国家基于农民多种主体立场的对这些努力的不同抵抗之间的关系。研究结果首先表明,国家是通过与捐赠机构(例如世界银行)建立货币和咨询关系而受到激励的。通过推广活动和强制措施,它试图获得其提议的“同意”,该提议转移了国家控制权,而不是真正分散决策权,从而使自我行为和自愿者成为新自由主义地下水保护的主体。但是,第二,一些农民通过抗议,非正式讨论,不参与以及通过灌溉合作伙伴关系共同获得地下水和灌溉资源而抵制了这些尝试。第三,农民对这些努力或支持的抵制因农民的多种主观(种姓,阶级和生态条件)而异。通过整合从政府性和葛兰西式方法中获得的有关社会权力和主观性的经验教训,本文不仅增进了我们对环境主体制定过程的理解,而且增进了环境治理的转移。 [出版物摘要]

著录项

  • 来源
    《The Geographical Journal》 |2009年第3期|p.208-220|共13页
  • 作者

    Trevor Birkenholtz;

  • 作者单位

    TREVOR BIRKENHOLTZDepartment of Geography, Rutgers University, 54 Joyce Kilmer Ave., Piscataway, NJ 08854-8045, USAE-mail: trevbirk@rci.rutgers.eduThis paper was accepted for publication in January 2009;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号