...
首页> 外文期刊>Geoforum >Environmental governance and the hybrid regime of Australian natural resource management
【24h】

Environmental governance and the hybrid regime of Australian natural resource management

机译:澳大利亚自然资源管理的环境治理与混合制度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this paper we explore hybridity in Australian natural resource governance, both 'inside' and 'outside' of neoliberalism. We develop an understanding of this governance regime as an assemblage of subjects, ethics, ends and techniques that constitute a hybrid of practices directed by three mentalities of government: neoliberalism, localism and ecocentrism. This three-way parentage engenders particularly complex internal dynamics - tensions and congruencies, grounds for contest and opportunities for collaboration - that shape and transform the regime. Our analysis clarifies the formative roles of the three logics and in so doing offers a new perspective of tripartite governance dynamics. We conclude by showing how the co-existing mentalities compete to establish NRM policy that is in accord with their respective ends and ethics, subjectify problems and other actors to fit with their own agendas, and attempt to secure primacy for those technologies congruent with their logics. At the same time, as mutually constitutive forces of the regime, they exhibit varying degrees of adaptivity as they co-opt or accommodate technologies favoured by their competitors.
机译:在本文中,我们探讨了新自由主义的“内部”和“外部”澳大利亚自然资源治理中的混合性。我们对这种治理制度的理解是主体,伦理,目的和技术的集合,这些构成了由三种政府思想指导的实践的混合体:新自由主义,地方主义和生态中心主义。这种三向联姻带来了特别复杂的内部动力-紧张和一致,竞争基础和合作机会-形成并改变了政权。我们的分析阐明了这三种逻辑的形成作用,从而为三方治理动态提供了新视角。最后,我们通过展示共存的心态如何竞争以建立符合各自目的和道德的NRM政策,使问题和其他行为者主体化以使其符合自己的议程,并尝试确保与他们的逻辑相一致的那些技术处于首要地位。同时,作为政权的相互构成力量,当他们选择或接受竞争对手所青睐的技术时,它们表现出不同程度的适应性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号