首页> 外文期刊>Geoforum >Civilizing the market for welfare friendly products in Europe?The techno-ethics of the Welfare Quality~® assessment
【24h】

Civilizing the market for welfare friendly products in Europe?The techno-ethics of the Welfare Quality~® assessment

机译:欧洲福利产品市场的文明化?福利质量〜®评估的技术伦理

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Greater attention to and anxiety about farm animal welfare emerged at the end of the 20th century, as worries over food safety and food quality (connected to the BSE, FMD and other epidemics) pushed farm animal welfare into public discourse and political debate. The creation of a transparent market for animal friendly produced foods is one of the strategies currently envisaged by the EU to meet the widely recognized challenge of promoting animal welfare without threatening the economic competitiveness of the animal farming industry in Europe (EU Animal Welfare Strategy, 2012-2015). This paper aims to contribute to debates on STS and food standards within the geographies of food literature. Empirically it draws on research carried out during the EU funded project Welfare Quality~®, which has proposed a protocol based on scientifically validated measures for assessing the welfare of chickens, pigs and cattle both on-farm and at slaughterhouse, in order to making 'accountable' the (ubiquitous) 'welfare claims' on animal products. While these developments have the potential to improve the life of farm animals by rewarding the most 'animal friendly' producers on the market, we address the matters of concern that arise from the implementation of the protocol by looking at a case study of UK based free-range chicken producers. Drawing on STS insights and especially on the work of Callon et al., (2002,2009) we look at the controversies that emerge about the 'welfare friendliness' qualification of free-range chickens and we discuss the role and partial achievements of this market for civilizing animal welfare politics and science. Civilizing markets; STS; Geographies of food consumption; Animal welfare standards
机译:20世纪末,随着人们对食品安全和食品质量的担忧(与疯牛病,口蹄疫和其他流行病有关),人们越来越关注和关注农场动物福利,从而将农场动物福利纳入公众讨论和政治辩论中。建立透明的动物友好型食品市场是欧盟目前为应对在不威胁欧洲畜牧业经济竞争力的情况下应对促进动物福利而广为接受的挑战的战略之一(欧盟动物福利战略,2012年) -2015)。本文旨在为有关食品文献地理范围内的STS和食品标准的辩论做出贡献。从经验上讲,它借鉴了欧盟资助的项目Welfare Quality〜®所进行的研究,该项目基于科学有效的措施提出了一项协议,旨在评估农场,屠宰场中鸡,猪和牛的福利,从而使“对动物产品(普遍存在的)“福利要求”负责。尽管这些进展有可能通过奖励市场上最“动物友好”的生产者来改善农场动物的生活,但我们通过研究基于英国的免费案例研究来解决由于实施该协议而引起的关注问题范围的鸡肉生产者。借助STS的见解,尤其是根据Callon等人(2002年,2009年)的工作,我们研究了有关散养鸡“福利友好”资格的争议,并讨论了该市场的作用和部分成就为了使动物福利政治和科学文明化。文明市场; STS;食品消费地域;动物福利标准

著录项

  • 来源
    《Geoforum》 |2013年第8期|63-72|共10页
  • 作者

    Mara Miele; John Lever;

  • 作者单位

    Cardiff University, School of Planning and Geography, Glamorgan Building, King Edward Ⅶ Avenue, CF10 3WA Cardiff, UK;

    Cardiff University, School of Planning and Geography, Glamorgan Building, King Edward Ⅶ Avenue, CF10 3WA Cardiff, UK;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Civilizing markets; STS; Geographies of food consumption; Animal welfare standards;

    机译:文明市场;STS;食品消费地域;动物福利标准;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 03:36:27

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号