...
首页> 外文期刊>Futures >Some firms still eschew online trading
【24h】

Some firms still eschew online trading

机译:一些公司仍然避开在线交易

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Last issue, we featured our Futures' Top 50 Brokers article, an annual listing of those brokerages with the highest customer equity as reported by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. Unsurprisingly, most of those firms have been the same over the past few years, just in slightly different orders. A few new names appeared as some firms consolidated and others dropped off the list, but overall the companies in the listing are similar from year to year―no surprise there. One thing that was a surprise, though, was the number of "N"s signifying a "no" answer to whether the firm offers online futures trading. Nine of our top 50 identified themselves as not offering cybertrading capabilities, And those nine were not limited to the companies toward the end of the list with lower customer equity and lesser-known names. Even our number three (Salomon Smith Barney Inc.) and number six (Morgan Stanley & Co.) ranked companies answered "no" to our survey question.
机译:上一期,我们刊登了《期货》杂志“前50名经纪人”的文章,该文章每年都会列出商品期货交易委员会报告的客户权益最高的那些经纪人。毫不奇怪,在过去几年中,大多数公司都是相同的,只是顺序略有不同。随着一些公司的合并和其他一些公司的退出,出现了一些新名称,但总体而言,上市公司每年都相似,这并不奇怪。不过,令人惊讶的是,“ N”表示该公司是否提供在线期货交易的答案为“否”。在我们排名前50位的公司中,有9家确定自己不提供网络交易功能,而这9家公司不仅仅局限于名单末尾,客户权益较低且名称不知名的公司。甚至我们排名第三的公司(Salomon Smith Barney Inc.)和排名第六的公司(Morgan Stanley&Co.)都对我们的调查问题回答“否”。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号