首页> 外文期刊>Futures >Welfare futures: Balancing progress with sustainability
【24h】

Welfare futures: Balancing progress with sustainability

机译:福利未来:平衡进步与可持续发展

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Social progress can be defined by the capacity to improve welfare and wellbeing. The expansion of life expectancy and quality of life, the reduction of poverty and social inequality, the attainment of higher levels of life satisfaction at old age as well as access to complete education suggest that judging on the attainment of individual capabilities [1], progress is possible, and that it can be enhanced by welfare programs and policy action. The key question is, however, how we can know whether welfare programs improve wellbeing. The meaning of wellbeing is a constructed one. Not surprisingly, the needs of individuals evolve together with economic and social development, and therefore any measure of welfare, and more generally progress, seems to expand accordingly. Some studies show that there is a very low association between economic growth and welfare expenditure [2], and other studies question that economic growth alone correlates with social progress proxies such as human height. So the question of whether welfare programs do result in the improvement of welfare is still unresolved and places the discipline of social policy at the top of the research agenda, especially for futures scholars. There have been many institutional attempts to improve human welfare in western societies throughout history, and a major one was the introduction of the welfare state in the mid-20th century. The welfare state relies on the view that it is more efficient for individuals to collectively insure against social risks. Indeed, it is well known that individuals cannot predict the future too well, hold myopic preferences in allocating resources and have difficulties in predicting needs at old age [3]. Therefore, welfare programs put in place by governments are generally designed to help individuals to attain general welfare goals.
机译:社会进步可以通过改善福利和福祉的能力来定义。预期寿命和生活质量的提高,贫困和社会不平等的减少,老年生活满意度的提高以及获得完整教育的机会表明,从个人能力的获得[1]是可能的,并且可以通过福利计划和政策措施来增强。然而,关键的问题是,我们如何才能知道福利计划是否会改善人们的福祉。幸福的含义是有根据的。毫不奇怪,个人的需求随着经济和社会发展的发展而变化,因此,任何形式的福利措施(更普遍地说是进步)似乎都在相应地扩大。一些研究表明,经济增长与福利支出之间的关联度很低[2],而另一些研究则质疑,经济增长本身就与诸如人的身高等社会进步指标相关。因此,有关福利计划是否确实能改善福利的问题仍未解决,并将社会政策学科置于研究议程的首位,特别是对于期货学者而言。在整个历史上,人们进行了许多旨在改善人类社会福利的体制性尝试,其中主要的尝试是在20世纪中叶引入了福利国家。福利国家基于这样的观点,即个人集体保险抵御社会风险更为有效。的确,众所周知,个人无法很好地预测未来,无法在分配资源时拥有近视偏好,并且在预测老年需求时会遇到困难[3]。因此,政府制定的福利计划通常旨在帮助个人实现总体福利目标。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Futures》 |2012年第7期|p.655-658|共4页
  • 作者

    Marta Vilella-Vila;

  • 作者单位

    Future Foundation, 81 Rivington Street, London EC2A 3AY, United Kingdom;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号