首页> 外文期刊>Future generation computer systems >Impact of pricing schemes on a market for Software-as-a-Service and perpetual software
【24h】

Impact of pricing schemes on a market for Software-as-a-Service and perpetual software

机译:定价方案对软件即服务和永久软件市场的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In this paper, we present an agent-based simulation system that allows modeling the interactions between software buyers and vendors in a software market. The market offers Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) and perpetual software (PS) licenses under different pricing schemes. Four dynamic pricing schemes are analyzed: derivative-follower pricing, demand-driven pricing, skimming pricing, and penetration pricing. Customer (buyer) agents respond to these prices by selecting the most appropriate software license scheme based on four criteria using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) decision support mechanism. The four decision criteria relate to finance, software capability, organization, and vendor. The simulation results show that the demand-driven pricing scheme is the most effective method but hard to implement since it requires perfect knowledge about market conditions. As an alternative, penetration pricing and skimming pricing could be used. In addition to this, it can be stated that SaaS is most attractive for small enterprises while PS is attractive for large enterprises.
机译:在本文中,我们介绍了一个基于代理的仿真系统,该系统可以对软件市场中软件购买者和销售者之间的交互进行建模。市场提供了不同定价方案下的软件即服务(SaaS)和永久软件(PS)许可。分析了四个动态定价方案:衍生从动定价,需求驱动定价,略读定价和渗透定价。客户(买方)代理商通过使用分析层次结构(AHP)决策支持机制根据四个标准选择最合适的软件许可方案,从而对这些价格做出响应。四个决策标准与财务,软件功能,组织和供应商有关。仿真结果表明,需求驱动的定价方案是最有效的方法,但由于它需要对市场状况的全面了解,因此难以实施。作为替代方案,可以使用渗透定价和略读定价。除此之外,可以说SaaS对小型企业最有吸引力,而PS对大型企业有吸引力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号