...
首页> 外文期刊>Fuel >Comparative study of regression modeling methods for online coal calorific value prediction from flame radiation features
【24h】

Comparative study of regression modeling methods for online coal calorific value prediction from flame radiation features

机译:基于火焰辐射特征在线预测煤热值的回归建模方法比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this paper, multiple regression methods are presented and compared for online coal calorific value prediction from multi-spectral flame radiation features. Several statistical approaches including principle component analysis (PCA), independent component analysis (ICA) and partial least squares analysis (PLSA) were used in linear and nonlinear regression analyses. Analyzing results show that nonlinear regression model can better approximate the relationship between the coal calorific value and the flame radiation features than linear regression model. In linear regression analysis, the performance of the linear coal calorific value prediction models was not improved by involving the statistical approaches. In nonlinear regression analysis, however, the performance of the prediction models was significantly improved when combined with the statistical approaches. The variation of coefficients of multiple regression showed that only the PLSA-based nonlinear regression model can discriminate useful feature components from useless feature components. The PLSA-based nonlinear regression model showed the best performance for coal calorific value prediction with the number of features reduced to about a third of that in the other models. With the PLSA-based nonlinear regression model, online coal calorific value prediction from the multi-band flame radiation features under the operating conditions used by the industrial boiler has the mean absolute error, standard deviation of the absolute errors, mean relative error and standard deviation of the relative errors of 148.76 kJ/kg, 291.86 kJ/kg, 0.76% and 1.53%, respectively. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:本文提出了多种回归方法,并根据多光谱火焰辐射特征对在线煤热值预测进行了比较。线性和非线性回归分析中使用了几种统计方法,包括主成分分析(PCA),独立成分分析(ICA)和偏最小二乘分析(PLSA)。分析结果表明,与线性回归模型相比,非线性回归模型可以更好地近似煤热值与火焰辐射特征之间的关系。在线性回归分析中,采用统计方法并不能提高线性煤热值预测模型的性能。但是,在非线性回归分析中,与统计方法结合使用时,预测模型的性能得到了显着改善。多元回归系数的变化表明,只有基于PLSA的非线性回归模型才能将有用的特征成分与无用的特征成分区分开。基于PLSA的非线性回归模型显示出最佳的煤热值预测性能,其特征数量减少到其他模型的三分之一。借助基于PLSA的非线性回归模型,在工业锅炉使用的运行条件下,根据多波段火焰辐射特征在线进行煤热值预测具有平均绝对误差,绝对误差的标准偏差,平均相对误差和标准偏差相对误差分别为148.76 kJ / kg,291.86 kJ / kg,0.76%和1.53%。 (C)2014 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Fuel》 |2015年第15期|164-172|共9页
  • 作者单位

    Beihang Univ, Sch Instrument Sci & Optoelect Engn, Key Lab Precis Optomechatron Technol, Minist Educ, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China;

    Beihang Univ, Sch Instrument Sci & Optoelect Engn, Key Lab Precis Optomechatron Technol, Minist Educ, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China;

    Beihang Univ, Sch Instrument Sci & Optoelect Engn, Key Lab Precis Optomechatron Technol, Minist Educ, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China;

    Beijing Huashengjincheng Sci & Technol Co Ltd, Beijing 100085, Peoples R China;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Coal calorific value; Flame radiation features; Multiple regression analysis; Statistical approach;

    机译:煤热值;火焰辐射特征;多元回归分析;统计方法;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号