首页> 外文期刊>Foundations and trends in finance >3 Conditional Performance Evaluation
【24h】

3 Conditional Performance Evaluation

机译:3条件绩效评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Traditional measures of risk-adjusted performance for mutual funds compare the average return of a fund with an OE benchmark designed to control for the fund's average risk. For example, Jensen's (1968) alpha is the difference between the return of a fund and a portfolio constructed from a market index and cash with fixed weights. The portfolio has the same average market exposure, or "beta" risk as the fund. The returns and beta risks are typically measured as averages over the evaluation period, and these averages are taken "unconditionally," or without regard to variations in the state of financial markets or the broader economy. One weakness of this unconditional approach relates to the likelihood of changes in the state of the economy. For example, if the evaluation period covers a bear market, but the period going forward is a bull market, the performance evaluation may not have much validity.
机译:传统的共同基金风险调整后绩效衡量标准将基金的平均收益与旨在控制基金平均风险的OE基准进行比较。例如,詹森(Jensen,1968)的阿尔法(alpha)是基金和由市场指数和权重固定的现金构成的投资组合的收益之差。该投资组合具有与该基金相同的平均市场风险或“β”风险。收益率和beta风险通常以评估期内的平均值来衡量,并且这些平均值是“无条件地”获得的,或者不考虑金融市场状况或整个经济的变化。这种无条件方法的一个缺点与经济状况发生变化的可能性有关。例如,如果评估期包括熊市,但以后的时期是牛市,则绩效评估可能没有太大的效用。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Foundations and trends in finance》 |2006年第2期|35-45|共11页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 01:21:54

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号